Misplaced Pages

User talk:TenPoundHammer: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:17, 19 September 2012 editDthomsen8 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers498,600 edits MI Markose: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 13:49, 19 September 2012 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 7d) to User talk:TenPoundHammer/Archive 14.Next edit →
Line 50: Line 50:


{{trout}} {{trout}}

== Re: Bubbling Under ==

I'm not sure that a consensus was achieved. I was hopeful that the 1/2a/2b/3a/3b/4 poll would make it easy, but only Eric444 made a decisive pick. Here's my take on things:
*Gongshow: Prefers the #101-125 format for the old songs; #1-25 for the new songs. Agreeable to all options (footnotes, separate columns, etc) that accomplish this goal.
*Kww: Prefers the #1-25 format for all songs. Seemed open to the suggestion of #101-125 for the old songs if all BU peaks were to be placed in a separate column.
*Eric444: Prefers the #101-125 format for all songs, citing Whitburn.
*Piriczki: Prefers the #101-125 format for the old songs; #1-25 for the new songs.
*Lil-unique1: Prefers the #1-25 format for all songs.
*My76Strat: Prefers the #1-25 for all songs. Seemed open to using footnotes to explain the BU chart differences.
*TenPoundHammer: You can answer this better than me of course, but if I read the thread correctly, you generally seemed (at least initially) to support Eric444's position.

I think those were all the participants to date. I left a message at ] as well. Cheers, <small><span style="background-color:#ffffff;border: 1px solid;">]</span></small><sup>]</sup> 23:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

== Disambiguation link notification for September 12 ==

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ] (]&nbsp;|&nbsp;]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 12:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)


== Talkback == == Talkback ==

Revision as of 13:49, 19 September 2012

NEW MESSAGES GO TO THE BOTTOM. NOT THE TOP.


I don't care if you respond to me here or on your talk page. But if you prefer the latter, please let me know in some way.

Template:Archive box collapsible

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Jax 0677's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Big & Rich artist page

I removed the references in the "Collaboration and Special Appearances" section because they all went to the same reference. The paragraph that starts with "In 2005, the duo contributed vocals to a rerecording of Billy Joe Shaver's 1993 song, "Live Forever"" is followed with a reference, number 43. The next paragraph then mentions other songs that Big & Rich have been involved in and they are all the same reference, number 43. This reference directs the reader to a page on Amazon.com that lists an album by Billy Joe Shaver that features Big & Rich on a track, not a site that details Rich or Kenny writing songs for other artists. I'm not sure what happened but this needs to be fixed or deleted.

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Dell9300's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Dell9300's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Grand Boulevard, Troost Avenue, Swope Parkway, Blue Parkway in Kansas City, MO

I don't care if it's a non-notable street. Please stop flagging articles. They are popular streets. Visionordream

tasty

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at SchuminWeb's talk page.
Message added 16:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

MI Markose

Consider MI Markose for your usual AfD attentions. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)