Misplaced Pages

Undershaw: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:55, 22 July 2012 editJusdafax (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers101,867 edits Further work on lede← Previous edit Revision as of 01:26, 24 September 2012 edit undoOhconfucius (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers328,947 edits style fixes (test)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Use British English|date=September 2012}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2012}}
{{Infobox UK place | {{Infobox UK place |
|country = England |country = England
|official_name= Undershaw |official_name= Undershaw
|static_image= ] |static_image= ]
|static_image_caption= The façade of Undershaw, circa 1900, with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's children Mary and Kingsley on the driveway. |static_image_caption= The façade of Undershaw, circa 1900, with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's children Mary and Kingsley on the driveway.
|latitude= 51.113252 |latitude= 51.113252
Line 12: Line 14:
}} }}


'''Undershaw''' is a former residence of ], the creator of ]. The unusual house was built for Doyle at his order, and is the location where he lived with his family from 1897 to 1907. Undershaw is where Doyle wrote many of his works, including '']''. For decades Undershaw served as a hotel, which closed in 2004, and the property has been vacant since then. It is currently (2012) proposed that it should be redeveloped into several residences, but that action has been successfully contested in court by preservationists to date. Undershaw is a former residence of ], the creator of ]. The unusual house was built for Doyle at his order, and is the location where he lived with his family from 1897 to 1907. Undershaw is where Doyle wrote many of his works, including '']''. For decades Undershaw served as a hotel, which closed in 2004, and the property has been vacant since then. It is currently (2012) proposed that it should be redeveloped into several residences, but that action has been successfully contested in court by preservationists to date.


==Location== ==Location==
Undershaw is located close to the ] in the village of ] in ], near the larger town of ] and is about {{convert|40|mi|km}} south of London. The name refers to the sheltering ]; 'shaw' is an ] word that means 'a nearby grove of hanging trees'.<ref name="Stashower 1999 199">{{cite book |title=Teller of Tales: the life of Arthur Conan Doyle |last=Stashower |first=Daniel |year= 1999|publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |isbn=0-8050-5074-4 |page=199 |accessdate= 28 August 2010}}</ref> The house is situated with a view of an undeveloped valley extending to the ].<ref name="whatstobecome">{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/3359609/Undershaw-Whats-to-become-of-it-Watson.html|title=Undershaw: What's to become of it, Watson?|accessdate=August 18, 2010 | location=London | work=The Daily Telegraph | first=Sinclair | last=McKay | date=2007-10-20}}</ref> Undershaw is located close to the ] in the village of ] in Surrey, near the larger town of ] and is about {{convert|40|mi|km}} south of London. The name refers to the sheltering ]; 'shaw' is an ] word that means 'a nearby grove of hanging trees'.<ref name="Stashower 1999 199">{{cite book |title=Teller of Tales: the life of Arthur Conan Doyle |last=Stashower |first=Daniel |year= 1999|publisher=Henry Holt and Company |location=New York |isbn=0-8050-5074-4 |page=199 |accessdate= 28 August 2010}}</ref> The house is situated with a view of an undeveloped valley extending to the ].<ref name="whatstobecome">{{cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/3359609/Undershaw-Whats-to-become-of-it-Watson.html|title=Undershaw: What's to become of it, Watson?|accessdate=18 August 2010 | location=London | work=The Daily Telegraph | first=Sinclair | last=McKay | date=20 October 2007}}</ref>


The location was chosen to cater to the medical needs of Doyle's wife Louise, nicknamed 'Touie', who suffered from ]; doctors of the era recommended healthy air, for which Surrey was known. Writing to his mother Mary in May 1895, Doyle lauded the building site because "... its height, its dryness, its sandy soil, its fir trees, and its shelter from all bitter winds present the conditions which all agree to be best in the treatment of ]. If we could have ordered Nature to construct a spot for us we could not have hit upon anything more perfect. ... I have bought 4 acres under £1000 and I don't think it will prove to be a bad investment." The location was chosen to cater to the medical needs of Doyle's wife Louise, nicknamed 'Touie', who suffered from ]; doctors of the era recommended healthy air, for which Surrey was known. Writing to his mother Mary in May 1895, Doyle lauded the building site because "... its height, its dryness, its sandy soil, its fir trees, and its shelter from all bitter winds present the conditions which all agree to be best in the treatment of ]. If we could have ordered Nature to construct a spot for us we could not have hit upon anything more perfect. ... I have bought 4 acres under £1000 and I don't think it will prove to be a bad investment."


In the same letter Doyle extolled the pleasures and convenience of the location. "As to my own amusements there I am within an hour of town and an hour from ]. I have golf, good cricket, my own billiard table, excellent society, a large lake to fish in not far off, riding if I choose to take it up, and some of the most splendid walks & scenery that could be possibly conceived." <ref name="Lellenberg 2007 353">{{cite book |title=Arthur Conan Doyle: a life in letters |last=Lellenberg |first=Jon |coauthors=Stashower & Foley |year= 2007 |publisher=The Penguin Press |location=New York |isbn=978-1-59420-135-6 |page=353 |accessdate=28 August 2010}}</ref> In the same letter Doyle extolled the pleasures and convenience of the location. "As to my own amusements there I am within an hour of town and an hour from ]. I have golf, good cricket, my own billiard table, excellent society, a large lake to fish in not far off, riding if I choose to take it up, and some of the most splendid walks & scenery that could be possibly conceived."<ref name="Lellenberg 2007 353">{{cite book |title=Arthur Conan Doyle: a life in letters |last=Lellenberg |first=Jon |coauthors=Stashower & Foley |year= 2007 |publisher=The Penguin Press |location=New York |isbn=978-1-59420-135-6 |page=353 |accessdate=28 August 2010}}</ref>


==Construction and style== ==Construction and style==
Line 27: Line 29:
'''"For Conan Doyle, who had spent his childhood bouncing from one flat to another in ], Undershaw brought a welcome stability. His own children, after the upheavals of the previous four years, now had a beautiful home and four acres of wooded land to explore."''' '''"For Conan Doyle, who had spent his childhood bouncing from one flat to another in ], Undershaw brought a welcome stability. His own children, after the upheavals of the previous four years, now had a beautiful home and four acres of wooded land to explore."'''


— from ''The Teller of Tales'' by Arthur Conan Doyle biographer Daniel Stashower <ref name="Stashower 1999 199"/></div> — from ''The Teller of Tales'' by Arthur Conan Doyle biographer Daniel Stashower<ref name="Stashower 1999 199"/></div>


Doyle commissioned the construction on the site by architect Joseph Henry Ball, whom Doyle described as "...an old friend and a man of most fastidious taste and critical turn of mind who will keep a constant eye upon the work." <ref name="Lellenberg 2007 353"/> Built in the style 'Surrey-vernacular', the house is largely composed of red brick and is ]. A factor in the construction was the large south-facing windows, which let in plentiful light, intended to provide a cheerful indoor environment. The windows also featured specially manufactured ] with a ] said to be that of Doyle's family; many of these have not survived the attacks of vandals in recent years. Doyle commissioned the construction on the site by architect Joseph Henry Ball, whom Doyle described as "...an old friend and a man of most fastidious taste and critical turn of mind who will keep a constant eye upon the work."<ref name="Lellenberg 2007 353"/> Built in the style 'Surrey-vernacular', the house is largely composed of red brick and is ]. A factor in the construction was the large south-facing windows, which let in plentiful light, intended to provide a cheerful indoor environment. The windows also featured specially manufactured ] with a ] said to be that of Doyle's family; many of these have not survived the attacks of vandals in recent years.


Undershaw's main entrance opened into an entry hall of two stories with a brick fireplace. Doyle's home also included a generator for the electric lighting, which was not common outside of cities at the time, and a dining room which could seat thirty people. A special display shelf in the wood-paneled ], located near the ceiling, displayed a collection of weapons, stuffed birds, walrus tusks and various trophies.<ref name="Stashower 1999 199"/> The doors of the house were also unusual in that they open both ways. The current internal layout has 14 bedrooms, with a size of {{convert|10000|sqft|m2}}.<ref name=whatstobecome /> Undershaw's main entrance opened into an entry hall of two stories with a brick fireplace. Doyle's home also included a generator for the electric lighting, which was not common outside of cities at the time, and a dining room which could seat thirty people. A special display shelf in the wood-panelled ], located near the ceiling, displayed a collection of weapons, stuffed birds, walrus tusks and various trophies.<ref name="Stashower 1999 199"/> The doors of the house were also unusual in that they open both ways. The current internal layout has 14 bedrooms, with a size of {{convert|10000|sqft|m2}}.<ref name=whatstobecome />


Doyle's three-storey home featured a grand staircase of shallow steps, to prevent Louise Doyle from becoming winded on the way upstairs. It also boasted a ] and Doyle's private book-lined study, where the author wrote some of his best-known work.<ref name="caseempty">{{Cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-conan-doyle-house-20100819,0,1403929,full.story |title=Sherlock Holmes (fans) and the case of the empty house|accessdate=August 18, 2010 | work=Los Angeles Times|first=Henry|last=Chu|date=18 August 2010}}</ref> Doyle's three-storey home featured a grand staircase of shallow steps, to prevent Louise Doyle from becoming winded on the way upstairs. It also boasted a ] and Doyle's private book-lined study, where the author wrote some of his best-known work.<ref name="caseempty">{{Cite news|url=http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-conan-doyle-house-20100819,0,1403929,full.story |title=Sherlock Holmes (fans) and the case of the empty house|accessdate=18 August 2010 | work=Los Angeles Times|first=Henry|last=Chu|date=18 August 2010}}</ref>


==History== ==History==
Line 39: Line 41:


==Redevelopment controversy== ==Redevelopment controversy==
] ]


Undershaw was converted into a hotel not long after Doyle sold it. During 2004, the hotel closed and the property was purchased by Fosseway Limited - it has remained unoccupied since that sale. On 18 August 2010 the '']'' reported<ref name=caseempty /> that plans are underway to redevelop the home into a multi-unit apartment building, stating "The hammers start raining blows on Undershaw as early as next month." Undershaw was converted into a hotel not long after Doyle sold it. During 2004, the hotel closed and the property was purchased by Fosseway Limited it has remained unoccupied since that sale. On 18 August 2010 the '']'' reported<ref name=caseempty /> that plans are underway to redevelop the home into a multi-unit apartment building, stating "The hammers start raining blows on Undershaw as early as next month."


The plan is opposed by ]s, who want to see the house preserved as a single structure (whatever form it is subsequently put to - such as a home or museum). However, in June, 2010 the ] Borough Council declined to buy Undershaw from the developer. The council's chief of planning, Matthew Evans, stated "We don't have that kind of money. We have to tighten our belts." But councillor Jim Edwards, the only vote against the planning officers’ recommendations, took the preservationists' side, saying "This house has got tremendous historical importance. This is a massive development, and quite unacceptable in my view." And Doyle's great-nephew Richard Doyle, reportedly 'upset', said "The family had been trying to come up with ways of buying it, but the price was so high we could not afford it. We just wish there was something we could do." The plan is opposed by ]s, who want to see the house preserved as a single structure (whatever form it is subsequently put to such as a home or museum). However, in June, 2010 the ] Borough Council declined to buy Undershaw from the developer. The council's chief of planning, Matthew Evans, stated "We don't have that kind of money. We have to tighten our belts." But councillor Jim Edwards, the only vote against the planning officers’ recommendations, took the preservationists' side, saying "This house has got tremendous historical importance. This is a massive development, and quite unacceptable in my view." And Doyle's great-nephew Richard Doyle, reportedly 'upset', said "The family had been trying to come up with ways of buying it, but the price was so high we could not afford it. We just wish there was something we could do."
<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2072565_conandoyle_descendants_upset_at_undershaw_plan|title=Conan-Doyle descendants upset at Undershaw plan|accessdate=August 29, 2010}}</ref> <ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.getsurrey.co.uk/news/s/2072565_conandoyle_descendants_upset_at_undershaw_plan|title=Conan-Doyle descendants upset at Undershaw plan|accessdate=29 August 2010}}</ref>


In March 2010 it was stated that the developer would accept £1.5 million for the property. <ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1257565/Its-mystery-stump-Sherlock-Holmes-Why-earth-letting-Conan-Doyles-home-fall-ruin.html |title=It's a mystery that would stump even Sherlock Holmes: Why on earth are we letting Conan Doyle's home fall into ruin? |accessdate=August 29, 2010 | location=London |work=Daily Mail |first=Robert |last=Hardman |date=12 March 2010}}</ref> In March 2010 it was stated that the developer would accept £1.5 million for the property.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1257565/Its-mystery-stump-Sherlock-Holmes-Why-earth-letting-Conan-Doyles-home-fall-ruin.html |title=It's a mystery that would stump even Sherlock Holmes: Why on earth are we letting Conan Doyle's home fall into ruin? |accessdate=29 August 2010 | location=London |work=Daily Mail |first=Robert |last=Hardman |date=12 March 2010}}</ref>


Preservationists were frustrated when attempts to promote Undershaw into the top rank of protected buildings failed.<ref> '']'', 29 July 2010, ''The Times'', 29 July 2010</ref><ref> ''Haslemere Herald'', 6 August 2010</ref><ref>, BBC, 2 August 2010</ref> A government report stated that the house was not architecturally notable, and that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was not of the same standing as ] or ]. Preservationists were frustrated when attempts to promote Undershaw into the top rank of protected buildings failed.<ref> '']'', 29 July 2010, ''The Times'', 29 July 2010</ref><ref> ''Haslemere Herald'', 6 August 2010</ref><ref>, BBC, 2 August 2010</ref> A government report stated that the house was not architecturally notable, and that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was not of the same standing as ] or ].
Line 53: Line 55:
During December 2010, the Undershaw Preservation Trust instigated ] proceedings at the ], in an attempt to overturn the decision by Waverley Borough Council to permit the conversion of Undershaw into flats.<ref>, BBC, 16 December 2010</ref><ref> ''The Telegraph'', 16 December 2010</ref><ref> ''The Independent'', 17 December 2010</ref><ref> BBC, 13 May 2011</ref> During December 2010, the Undershaw Preservation Trust instigated ] proceedings at the ], in an attempt to overturn the decision by Waverley Borough Council to permit the conversion of Undershaw into flats.<ref>, BBC, 16 December 2010</ref><ref> ''The Telegraph'', 16 December 2010</ref><ref> ''The Independent'', 17 December 2010</ref><ref> BBC, 13 May 2011</ref>


On May 30, 2012, the High Court overturned the redevelopment of Undershaw due to legal flaws. The council's decisions to grant planning permission and listed building consent must be quashed. On 30 May 2012, the High Court overturned the redevelopment of Undershaw due to legal flaws. The council's decisions to grant planning permission and listed building consent must be quashed.


==References== ==References==

Revision as of 01:26, 24 September 2012

Human settlement in England
Undershaw
The façade of Undershaw, circa 1900, with Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's children Mary and Kingsley on the driveway.
OS grid referenceSU8875735647
District
Shire county
Region
CountryEngland
Sovereign stateUnited Kingdom
PoliceSurrey
FireSurrey
AmbulanceSouth East Coast
List of places
UK
England
Surrey

Undershaw is a former residence of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes. The unusual house was built for Doyle at his order, and is the location where he lived with his family from 1897 to 1907. Undershaw is where Doyle wrote many of his works, including The Hound of the Baskervilles. For decades Undershaw served as a hotel, which closed in 2004, and the property has been vacant since then. It is currently (2012) proposed that it should be redeveloped into several residences, but that action has been successfully contested in court by preservationists to date.

Location

Undershaw is located close to the A333 road in the village of Hindhead in Surrey, near the larger town of Haslemere and is about 40 miles (64 km) south of London. The name refers to the sheltering flora; 'shaw' is an Anglo-Saxon word that means 'a nearby grove of hanging trees'. The house is situated with a view of an undeveloped valley extending to the South Downs.

The location was chosen to cater to the medical needs of Doyle's wife Louise, nicknamed 'Touie', who suffered from tuberculosis; doctors of the era recommended healthy air, for which Surrey was known. Writing to his mother Mary in May 1895, Doyle lauded the building site because "... its height, its dryness, its sandy soil, its fir trees, and its shelter from all bitter winds present the conditions which all agree to be best in the treatment of phthisis. If we could have ordered Nature to construct a spot for us we could not have hit upon anything more perfect. ... I have bought 4 acres under £1000 and I don't think it will prove to be a bad investment."

In the same letter Doyle extolled the pleasures and convenience of the location. "As to my own amusements there I am within an hour of town and an hour from Portsmouth. I have golf, good cricket, my own billiard table, excellent society, a large lake to fish in not far off, riding if I choose to take it up, and some of the most splendid walks & scenery that could be possibly conceived."

Construction and style

[Dracula creator] Bram Stoker, who visited in 1907, found the house "cozy and snug to a remarkable degree", and added that the many curios and artworks created an effect like a "fairy pleasure house." ...

"For Conan Doyle, who had spent his childhood bouncing from one flat to another in Edinburgh, Undershaw brought a welcome stability. His own children, after the upheavals of the previous four years, now had a beautiful home and four acres of wooded land to explore."

— from The Teller of Tales by Arthur Conan Doyle biographer Daniel Stashower

Doyle commissioned the construction on the site by architect Joseph Henry Ball, whom Doyle described as "...an old friend and a man of most fastidious taste and critical turn of mind who will keep a constant eye upon the work." Built in the style 'Surrey-vernacular', the house is largely composed of red brick and is asymmetrical. A factor in the construction was the large south-facing windows, which let in plentiful light, intended to provide a cheerful indoor environment. The windows also featured specially manufactured stained glass with a coat of arms said to be that of Doyle's family; many of these have not survived the attacks of vandals in recent years.

Undershaw's main entrance opened into an entry hall of two stories with a brick fireplace. Doyle's home also included a generator for the electric lighting, which was not common outside of cities at the time, and a dining room which could seat thirty people. A special display shelf in the wood-panelled drawing room, located near the ceiling, displayed a collection of weapons, stuffed birds, walrus tusks and various trophies. The doors of the house were also unusual in that they open both ways. The current internal layout has 14 bedrooms, with a size of 10,000 square feet (930 m).

Doyle's three-storey home featured a grand staircase of shallow steps, to prevent Louise Doyle from becoming winded on the way upstairs. It also boasted a billiards room and Doyle's private book-lined study, where the author wrote some of his best-known work.

History

Doyle lived at Undershaw for a decade between 1897 and 1907 (Louise died in 1906). The house was the place where many of Doyle's most famous works were composed including The Great Boer War, The Hound of the Baskervilles, The Adventures of Gerard, The Return of Sherlock Holmes and Sir Nigel. Doyle also entertained many notable house guests at Undershaw including Sherlock Holmes illustrator Sidney Paget, the famous Sherlock Holmes actor William Gillette and the creator of Dracula, Bram Stoker. Other notable visitors included E.W. Hornung, J.M. Barrie, Thomas Wemyss Reid, Gordon Guggisberg, Churton Collins, Virginia Woolf and Bertram Fletcher Robinson.

Redevelopment controversy

The façade of Undershaw during 2010

Undershaw was converted into a hotel not long after Doyle sold it. During 2004, the hotel closed and the property was purchased by Fosseway Limited – it has remained unoccupied since that sale. On 18 August 2010 the Los Angeles Times reported that plans are underway to redevelop the home into a multi-unit apartment building, stating "The hammers start raining blows on Undershaw as early as next month."

The plan is opposed by preservationists, who want to see the house preserved as a single structure (whatever form it is subsequently put to – such as a home or museum). However, in June, 2010 the Waverley Borough Council declined to buy Undershaw from the developer. The council's chief of planning, Matthew Evans, stated "We don't have that kind of money. We have to tighten our belts." But councillor Jim Edwards, the only vote against the planning officers’ recommendations, took the preservationists' side, saying "This house has got tremendous historical importance. This is a massive development, and quite unacceptable in my view." And Doyle's great-nephew Richard Doyle, reportedly 'upset', said "The family had been trying to come up with ways of buying it, but the price was so high we could not afford it. We just wish there was something we could do."

In March 2010 it was stated that the developer would accept £1.5 million for the property.

Preservationists were frustrated when attempts to promote Undershaw into the top rank of protected buildings failed. A government report stated that the house was not architecturally notable, and that Sir Arthur Conan Doyle was not of the same standing as Jane Austen or Charles Dickens.

During December 2010, the Undershaw Preservation Trust instigated judicial review proceedings at the High Court of Justice, in an attempt to overturn the decision by Waverley Borough Council to permit the conversion of Undershaw into flats.

On 30 May 2012, the High Court overturned the redevelopment of Undershaw due to legal flaws. The council's decisions to grant planning permission and listed building consent must be quashed.

References

  1. ^ Stashower, Daniel (1999). Teller of Tales: the life of Arthur Conan Doyle. New York: Henry Holt and Company. p. 199. ISBN 0-8050-5074-4. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help)
  2. ^ McKay, Sinclair (20 October 2007). "Undershaw: What's to become of it, Watson?". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 18 August 2010.
  3. ^ Lellenberg, Jon (2007). Arthur Conan Doyle: a life in letters. New York: The Penguin Press. p. 353. ISBN 978-1-59420-135-6. {{cite book}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  4. ^ Chu, Henry (18 August 2010). "Sherlock Holmes (fans) and the case of the empty house". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 August 2010.
  5. "Conan-Doyle descendants upset at Undershaw plan". Retrieved 29 August 2010.
  6. Hardman, Robert (12 March 2010). "It's a mystery that would stump even Sherlock Holmes: Why on earth are we letting Conan Doyle's home fall into ruin?". Daily Mail. London. Retrieved 29 August 2010.
  7. "Conan Doyle and the barbarians" The Times, 29 July 2010, "Conan Doyle campaigners fight to save the house of the Baskervilles" The Times, 29 July 2010
  8. "Pressure on Hunt's department to save Conan Doyle's home" Haslemere Herald, 6 August 2010
  9. "Conan Doyles in call to minister over Undershaw", BBC, 2 August 2010
  10. "Conan Doyle supporters take Undershaw fight to court", BBC, 16 December 2010
  11. "Sherlock Holmes fans stage last-ditch attempt to save Conan Doyle's home" The Telegraph, 16 December 2010
  12. "Battle is on to save the house that Conan Doyle built" The Independent, 17 December 2010
  13. "Campaign against development of Conan Doyle's Undershaw" BBC, 13 May 2011

External links

Categories: