Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 10:40, 24 September 2012

Archives:

• Archive 1
• Archive 2

AN/I report made

Per your desire to justify your breaking of the 1RR rule at Tea Party movement, you have a clear shot at justifying your refusal to self-revert when given the chance. Cheers. Collect (talk) 23:58, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cognitive behavioral therapy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anorexia

Psychoanalysis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Anorexia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Why the removal of the expand tag?

We are discussing this in Talk. Join us there instead of just reverting a good faith addition. Cwobeel (talk) 15:19, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Mitt Romney tax returns controversy

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mitt Romney's tax returns decided to delete that, and the redirect at Mitt Romney's tax returns is protected to enforce that decision. You cannot do an end-run round that protection by adding "controversy" to the title. If you want to challenge the result of the AfD, go first to Mark Arsten (talk), the closing admin, and then if not satisfied to WP:DRV. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

the small survey

Hello cartoondiablo,

I saw you try to push the tabele again into the articles. Please realize that this is not a usefull extension. Your contribution would be wellcome if you write an overview about the hole field of psychotherapy research not only based on ONE small and highly selective study. This kind of approach is called POV in wikipedia. Thank you for your cooperation. --WSC 04:31, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Cognitive behavioral therapy. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Take it easy, bring it to WP:DR. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 04:42, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:INSERM Psychotherapy Effectiveness Study.svg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:INSERM Psychotherapy Effectiveness Study.svg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Dispute resolution discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute in which you may have been involved. Content disputes can hold up article development, therefore we request your participation in the discussion to help find a resolution. The thread is "Family therapy". Thank you! EarwigBot  10:36, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

FYI

Howdy, I started a new Incident. I'm curious about it. Hand (Have a nice day). --WSC 16:34, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

September 2012

Your insertion of that table has been rejected by other editors on three articles. When it went to dispute resolution the general view was that text alone was enough. You may think it was closed prematurely, and its your right to dispute or raise it again. However until the community agrees with you disputed material stays out of the article. ----Snowded 04:01, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

PS - I have added a note about this to the ANI case and at dispute resolution which appears to be confirming the previous position----Snowded 04:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

On the CBT page there are two editors for insertion of the table, two against. At the DRP all editors said the table gave a misleading impression. This is a clear community consensus against its insertion. On Misplaced Pages we do not re-insert controversial material just because one editor has added a comment to the DRP discussion. And that is all you have done, its not clear if its open again or not. If you persist then you will be reported for a slow edit war. I am also assembling some of the counter evidence to your french study and I will also aim to balance the text next when I have that. Our role here is to reflect the literature, not give one side of the story. Now please abide by process and stop the slow edit war. ----Snowded 03:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Just to help you out here. We have the following comments at DRP:

1. Dmitrij D Czarkoff "the table should be rewritten as prose" and "I fully concur with all the other participants in all three DRN cases that the table should not be present in the article in whatever format"
2. SGCM "prose is still the best option because it is more neutral while conveying the same information"
3. SGCM "the image suggestion was again struck down and most of the editors including me, agreed that prose remained the best option"
4. Kerfuffler "I can say for sure that the table is WP:OR'

Note that these deal specifically with the image as well as the table. All of that will go in a 3rr report if you force me to make it. ----Snowded 04:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Misplaced Pages email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Misplaced Pages will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Misplaced Pages).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Misplaced Pages better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Questia online library codes failed to deliver

We tried to use Misplaced Pages email to deliver your account access information but you either did not provide an email address in your preferences or had it set up not to receive messages from other editors. You can change both on the first page of Special:Preferences. To fix the situation directly or to let me know you've changed your preferences, just email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers, Ocaasi 05:30, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit war at psychoanalysis

• I've protected Psychoanalysis due to the edit war you were participating in. Could you please not do this again once protection expires? If you do it is likely you will be blocked. --John (talk) 17:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Psychotherapies ArbCom

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Psychotherapies and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests#Requests for Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Tijfo098 (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC)