| Revision as of 11:05, 18 October 2012 editThe Banner (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers124,941 edits →Sollentuna Hundred← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:43, 18 October 2012 edit undoGene93k (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers468,040 editsm Listing on WP:DELSORT under SwedenNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Keep''' ] is fighting a war against ] articles. See also: ]. ] (]) 03:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | *'''Keep''' ] is fighting a war against ] articles. See also: ]. ] (]) 03:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *:When you don't have arguments, you better shut up then starting to throw PAs. ] ] 11:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | *:When you don't have arguments, you better shut up then starting to throw PAs. ] ] 11:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 22:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 22:43, 18 October 2012
Sollentuna Hundred
- Sollentuna Hundred (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One-liner without references or proof of notability. Fails WP:GNG. Can be merged with List of hundreds of Sweden (although that list seems to be incompleet). The Banner talk 01:00, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - I should note that the Swedish equivalent of the article contains more information and sources. Perhaps a user or two fluent with Swedish can translate the content? SwisterTwister talk 03:02, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - this is a valid geographic area historically, and Swedish WP already lists sources, so on both grounds GNG is not really an issue. I can translate it as and when, but the AfD does not depend on that: notability is shown by the existence of sources, not their inclusion in an article. I would oppose a merge to the list of hundreds; there is plenty to say about this one place. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep As I understand policy, officially recognised geographical entities are notable (per WP:NGEO), whether they're still used officially or not - since notability isn't temporary (WP:NTEMP), we don't delete things that are no longer official geographical entities. If it's identical with a modern entity you might merge there, but nobody's suggested that. One of the functions of Misplaced Pages is to serve as a gazetteer. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:55, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep User:The Banner is fighting a war against Sollentuna articles. See also: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sollentuna Parish. ChemTerm (talk) 03:24, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- When you don't have arguments, you better shut up then starting to throw PAs. The Banner talk 11:05, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)