| Revision as of 19:51, 24 October 2012 editPraxis Icosahedron (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,476 edits Answer← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:32, 25 October 2012 edit undoWikiEditor2004 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users51,646 edits do not contact me here about issues in commons and do not copy paste here my comments from commons, thank youNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==Answer== | |||
| If you created this account only to attack me personally or my work that is your personal problem and I have no intention to play your marathonic rhetorical games. You are free to propose any of my maps for deletion, but be aware that personal user opinions such is your own are never accepted as a valid reason for deletion. I have prepared scaned pages from that history atlas and I can always upload these pages and show them to administrators so that they can see that my primary source is a valid one. ] (]) 09:29, 21 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :You're allowed to confirm that I have used this account since the 6th of July 2012 at Misplaced Pages, and as you may not have realized yet, that account can also be used at Wikimedia Commons. So under no circumstances was this account "created to attack you or your work". I am sorry if you somehow feel offended, but in my opinion, and as will be judged by a third party, I believe it is you who have shown unwillingness to ] by replying me the following the first thing you did: "''are you relevant person to dispute their scientific authority?''", in effect choosing to not ]. Misplaced Pages also writes the following: ''Don't marginalize others: If you dismiss other points of view, or attempt to marginalize the people who hold them, your position may actually be the marginal one. Instead, ask sincere questions to see where the differences are and which editors are on solid ground.'' I believe it is important for you to realize that criticism of your work does not equal a personal attack on you. Nevertheless, after my elaborate response to you where I offered an explanation as to why your map is inaccurate, you simply answered by deleting the whole discussion while also launching false accusations against me by writing: ''I should not respond to such personal attacks anyway'', and on your Misplaced Pages page, ''deleted bad faith comment that contains personal attacks against me''. These are false accusations abusing the policies of wikipedia and possibly qualify as ], i.e. ''deliberately using Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines in bad faith to thwart the aims of Misplaced Pages''. Overall, you have not been willing to comprise or discuss the matter (]), instead you write the following: ''find somebody else to play your game, ok?''. If you do have, as you write, ''scaned pages from that history atlas and I can always upload these pages and show them to administrators so that they can see that my primary source is a valid one'', please show them to me and prove your willingness to negotiate. But please make sure that the legend of the maps is visible. In that case, you may also want to explain how your map contradicts what is actually written in the ] article. I will be waiting for your reply, and only if I do not receive it, seek help for dispute resolution. Regards. ] (]) 19:48, 24 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:32, 25 October 2012
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. When you recently edited Karachay-Cherkessia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pervomayskoye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
Naming convention discussion
Hello Panonian. This message is just to alert you that a discussion on translations for non-Slavic persons from Yugoslavia and successor states is set to take place. There is a reason I am informing you. The disputes where I have been involved have concerned editors removing Slavic (mainly Cyrillic) translations from persons born on the territory; this has now happened so many times that the matter is expected to be dealt by mediation. Now it will not surprise you to know that opponents to this practice are the ethnic Albanian editors who somehow feel that when a subject of theirs be born in or will have lived on any former Yugoslav territory, the Cyrillic/Slavic variation is not relevant. To that end, you would think that opponents of the Slavic language translations would be presenting a case whereby they believe the ethnic Albanian nation to be exempt from such presentations. However, judging by the title Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Naming conventions of non-Slavic personalities that were born or lived in former Yugoslavia, it would appear that all non-Slavic subjects are the topic to the debate and the region in question is all of the former Yugoslavia. In other words, this will affect Vojvodina as well. At present, all Hungarian, Romanian, Roma and other non-Slavic subjects have a Serbian or Serbo-Croat name form. If the outcome be to have translations removed, it will become procedure to remove translations on everyone from Janika Balázs to Sándor Páll. As you watch many of the pages close to Vojvodina, I thought you may be interested. If you'd like to join the debate, just add your name to the request for mediation link posted above. Thanks. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 12:32, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Bratislava - Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Geopolitical,_ethnic,_and_religious_conflicts#Alternative_names_in_begin_section
Maybe you should join . Best regards. --River party (talk) 08:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kazan-Khanate-map.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Kazan-Khanate-map.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
Religion in Serbia bar box
PANONIAN, you asked me not to change the numbers in table, which is OK if you though rounding the numbers up (like from 84.98), but what about undeclared, irreligious and others? They are clearly included in Serbian census from 2002, as seen in Book 3: "Confession, Mother Tongue and National Identity or Ethnicity According to Age and Gender – Data by Municipalities", which can be read on . With respect/regards, 109.93.89.159 (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- In the case you did not noticed, your addition of this data was not visible in the table in your article version: (and why including into article something that is not visible?). If you want to include this data into article, please do it correctly. PANONIAN 17:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, sorry, I looked wrong table. I will revert first table to your version. PANONIAN 17:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I'll probably (if someone doesn't do it in the meantime) add non-rounded percents in the table box tomorrow. I will also add table box to Religion in Vojvodina. Veliki pozdrav od 109.93.89.159 (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, just do not change numbers that I included into existing tables, since these are correct ones. You are free to include your tables. PANONIAN 17:53, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, I'll probably (if someone doesn't do it in the meantime) add non-rounded percents in the table box tomorrow. I will also add table box to Religion in Vojvodina. Veliki pozdrav od 109.93.89.159 (talk) 17:47, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- OK, sorry, I looked wrong table. I will revert first table to your version. PANONIAN 17:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Religion in … dispute
You probably didn't know, but you're all actually in one dispute. Uncle G (talk) 08:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)
Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.
In this issue:
- Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
- Research: The most recent DR data
- Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
- Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
- DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
- Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
- Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?
--The Olive Branch 19:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Banate of Mačva
I requested move in the case of Banate of Mačva article. May I ask you to tell your opinion? See: talk page. --Norden1990 (talk) 16:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Visoko
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Visoko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 26 September 2012 (UTC)