Misplaced Pages

User:Dweller/Featured Articles that haven't been on Main Page: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:Dweller Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:28, 23 October 2012 editYellow Evan (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,263 edits →2006: re-review one← Previous edit Revision as of 10:26, 25 October 2012 edit undoDweller (talk | contribs)Bureaucrats, Oversighters, Administrators55,876 edits →2006: +2Next edit →
Line 41: Line 41:
* ] FAR n/a - Review: Serious issues. Unsourced casualty numbers in Lead, conflict with casualty numbers in Lead and infobox, conflict in combatant numbers between Lead and infobox, contradiction between Lead and body as to what the Japanese commander knew of US strength. Final citation used to apparently source detailed comparison of real events and depiction of the battle, but none of the detail is actually present in the source. Inappropriate for Main Page currently. * ] FAR n/a - Review: Serious issues. Unsourced casualty numbers in Lead, conflict with casualty numbers in Lead and infobox, conflict in combatant numbers between Lead and infobox, contradiction between Lead and body as to what the Japanese commander knew of US strength. Final citation used to apparently source detailed comparison of real events and depiction of the battle, but none of the detail is actually present in the source. Inappropriate for Main Page currently.
* ] FAR n/a - Review: "frenzied mob" needs a source, as does "one of the finest natural harbors in the South Pacific". Some text issues, eg "utilizing improvised explosive charges to kill the Japanese defenders taking cover in the many caves and fighting positions spread throughout the hill and ravine. Employing the improvised explosives, the individual Japanese fighting positions were destroyed." Otherwise, probably fine with a going-over * ] FAR n/a - Review: "frenzied mob" needs a source, as does "one of the finest natural harbors in the South Pacific". Some text issues, eg "utilizing improvised explosive charges to kill the Japanese defenders taking cover in the many caves and fighting positions spread throughout the hill and ravine. Employing the improvised explosives, the individual Japanese fighting positions were destroyed." Otherwise, probably fine with a going-over
* ] FAR n/a - Review: some light referencing. Claim of a "rout" in the Lead not referenced and not supported (possibly contradicted) by description in body. "Notorious", as currently used, is POV. Article looks like it could be fixed-up relatively easily.
* ] FAR n/a - Review:
* ] FAR n/a - Review: * ] FAR n/a - Review:
* ] FAR n/a - Review: Huge paragraphs in an oversized Lead. Pretty well referenced. Minor niggle: MATS "plan" or "plans"? Some odd use of photo caption to include important sourced material that should be in the main text and is not. What was he "seriously ill" with when he resigned? What was "stage-managed" about the press conference (aren't press conferences by definition stage-managed? They're hardly spontaneous.) Article doesn't properly address his retirement from anything other than premiership - retirement from politics is alluded to only. These issues makes me suppose there are others I'm missing on this whistlestop lookthrough. Probably inappropriate for Main Page currently.
* ] FAR n/a - Review:
* ] FAR n/a - Review: * ] FAR n/a - Review:
* ] FAR n/a - Review: * ] FAR n/a - Review:

Revision as of 10:26, 25 October 2012

1,330 articles in total, as of October 2012.

2003

None

2004

Tally:

  • Three articles
  • One recently reviewed at FAC or FAR
  • Of the remaining two, one is currently inappropriate for Main Page and one needs a small amount of work

2005

  • Dietrich v The Queen FAR: 2009 Review: n/a Not considered due to relatively recent FAR.
  • Music of Maryland FAR: n/a Review: Lead a little short. Some evidence of recentism. Lots of ORish unreferenced claims spotted, eg "There have been no major musicological studies in Maryland" and "The oystermen and others who work on the Chesapeake Bay have their own distinct folk song styles". Inappropriate for Main Page currently.
  • Cincinnati, Lebanon and Northern Railway FAR: 2008 Review: Large sections devoid of inline references. Inappropriate for Main Page currently.

Tally:

  • Three articles
  • One recently reviewed at FAC or FAR
  • Of the remaining two, both are currently inappropriate for Main Page

2006

Many of these articles have short Leads, frequently two short parags.

Tally:

  • 55 articles
  • Three recently reviewed at FAC or FAR
  • Of the remaining 52, xx are currently inappropriate for Main Page and xx need a small amount of work

2007

FAR'd

2008