Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ham and jelly butter: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:05, 7 May 2006 editHam and jelly butter (talk | contribs)103 editsm don't make threats to me← Previous edit Revision as of 12:45, 7 May 2006 edit undoHam and jelly butter (talk | contribs)103 editsm UNBLOCK NOW~!Next edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
==]== ==]==
You are invited to vote at ]. All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! ] 21:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC) You are invited to vote at ]. All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! ] 21:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

{{unblock|singled out for a block on account of my political feelings, blocking was unwarrented, POV of admin should NEVER result in a block}}

Revision as of 12:45, 7 May 2006

Please do not make bad faith AfD nominations of articles such as George W. Bush. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

how is it bad faith?--Ham and jelly butter 21:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Well, it seems that way. If you honestly believe what you wrote in that AfD nomination, take it to the talk page and attempt to achieve concensus. WP:SNOWBALL- The article would obviously fail the deletion process, so please do not put it through the deletion process. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop advertising the AfD on people's user pages. I can assure you that it would fail. Infact, you've already garnered one Speedy Keep vote. Please don't do this. Suggesting changes on the Talk:George W. Bush page is more productive and stands more chance of actually accomplishing something. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Please stop advertising this AfD on usertalk pages. This is not a productive way to go about what you are trying to accomplish. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

I'll stop--Ham and jelly butter 22:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I'll unblock you. AnnH 22:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

like your style

I don't know who you are, but I like your style, and recognize your notif list. Let's collaborate some time. Morton devonshire 01:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)

You are invited to vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 21:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Ham and jelly butter (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

singled out for a block on account of my political feelings, blocking was unwarrented, POV of admin should NEVER result in a block

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=singled out for a block on account of my political feelings, blocking was unwarrented, POV of admin should NEVER result in a block |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=singled out for a block on account of my political feelings, blocking was unwarrented, POV of admin should NEVER result in a block |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=singled out for a block on account of my political feelings, blocking was unwarrented, POV of admin should NEVER result in a block |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category: