Revision as of 19:54, 7 May 2006 editHam and jelly butter (talk | contribs)103 editsm →block← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:58, 7 May 2006 edit undoDeskana (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users22,062 edits →block: commentNext edit → | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
You've been temporarily blocked for trolling and vandalism re: ] and ]. -- ] 19:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | You've been temporarily blocked for trolling and vandalism re: ] and ]. -- ] 19:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
*there's no vandalism and no trolling, your bot must be broken, all i did was start a NPOV rewrite of the GWB article, which your screwy bot BLANKED before i could complete, making it LOOK like i was blanking it--] 19:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | *there's no vandalism and no trolling, your bot must be broken, all i did was start a NPOV rewrite of the GWB article, which your screwy bot BLANKED before i could complete, making it LOOK like i was blanking it--] 19:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
**What bot are you talking about? And how can a bot possibly change your edit? Stop making excuses- regardless of your intentions, you should have known better than to remove a giant chunk of text (practically all the article, infact) from a high-view page like ]. --] <sup>]</sup> 19:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:58, 7 May 2006
Please do not make bad faith AfD nominations of articles such as George W. Bush. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- how is it bad faith?--Ham and jelly butter 21:57, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, it seems that way. If you honestly believe what you wrote in that AfD nomination, take it to the talk page and attempt to achieve concensus. WP:SNOWBALL- The article would obviously fail the deletion process, so please do not put it through the deletion process. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 21:59, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Please stop advertising the AfD on people's user pages. I can assure you that it would fail. Infact, you've already garnered one Speedy Keep vote. Please don't do this. Suggesting changes on the Talk:George W. Bush page is more productive and stands more chance of actually accomplishing something. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:06, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop advertising this AfD on usertalk pages. This is not a productive way to go about what you are trying to accomplish. --Darth Deskana (talk page) 22:11, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
I'll stop--Ham and jelly butter 22:16, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll unblock you. AnnH ♫ 22:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
like your style
I don't know who you are, but I like your style, and recognize your notif list. Let's collaborate some time. Morton devonshire 01:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination)
You are invited to vote at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (2nd nomination). All this is is ramblings/blog/rants about Bush. Not encyclopedic, should've been deleted long ago. Happy editing! Morton devonshire 21:39, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
block
You've been temporarily blocked for trolling and vandalism re: George W. Bush and George W. Bush military service controversy. -- Curps 19:51, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- there's no vandalism and no trolling, your bot must be broken, all i did was start a NPOV rewrite of the GWB article, which your screwy bot BLANKED before i could complete, making it LOOK like i was blanking it--Ham and jelly butter 19:54, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- What bot are you talking about? And how can a bot possibly change your edit? Stop making excuses- regardless of your intentions, you should have known better than to remove a giant chunk of text (practically all the article, infact) from a high-view page like George W. Bush. --Lord Deskana 19:58, 7 May 2006 (UTC)