| Revision as of 00:49, 8 May 2006 editNoosphere (talk | contribs)2,421 edits The "new and improved" Wikiethics policy proposal← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:26, 8 May 2006 edit undoRgulerdem (talk | contribs)1,773 edits improvementNext edit → | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| In case anyone's interested 's a diff of the old vs "new and improved" Wikiethics proposal. -- ]<font color="green">]</font>] 00:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | In case anyone's interested 's a diff of the old vs "new and improved" Wikiethics proposal. -- ]<font color="green">]</font>] 00:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| == Improvement and discussion on the Wikiethics proposal == | |||
| If you would like to join the efforts of improving Wikiethics proposal please do so on . Thanks... ] 10:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:26, 8 May 2006
Poll Summary
On March 17th two polls regarding this article were started. Both ended on the 31st of March 2006.
The "Approval Poll", which started at 00:22:33 UTC stated: "I think the build time for this has been going on more than long enough and now is the time to get a consensus as to whether this should be approved or not. This is not a majority poll since polls are evil and Wikjipedia runs by consensus." Result: 3 Support, 38 Oppose.
The "Do we need a poll at this stage" poll, which started at 05:32:34 UTC, stated: "Please let us know whether you think an approval poll is necessary at this stage?" Result: 13 No, 4 Yes.
Disagree with Archiving
As a former heavy contributor to this talk page I do not agree with it's having been achived and view this archiving as further evidence of User:Rgulerdem's owning of this project. I would highly, highly recommend that anyone considering adding to this talk page first review the above archives to completely understand the nature of this project and how it came to be fully rejected. Netscott 17:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- I agree, as far as the earlier proposal goes. But now Rgulerdem and friends are claiming there's a "a new and improved version". So the archived discussion isn't, on the face of it, quite as relevant. On the other hand, though I haven't looked a the new proposal yet, I wouldn't be surprised if it's really not all that different from the old, rejected proposal. So the old archives and polls will likely continue to be quite relevant for this "new and improved" proposal. -- noosphere 21:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
The "new and improved" Wikiethics policy proposal
In case anyone's interested here's a diff of the old vs "new and improved" Wikiethics proposal. -- noosphere 00:49, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Improvement and discussion on the Wikiethics proposal
If you would like to join the efforts of improving Wikiethics proposal please do so on this page. Thanks... Resid Gulerdem 10:26, 8 May 2006 (UTC)