| Revision as of 06:04, 4 November 2012 editAmandallc (talk | contribs)13 edits →A younger photo request← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:05, 4 November 2012 edit undoAmandallc (talk | contribs)13 edits →A younger photo requestNext edit → | ||
| Line 79: | Line 79: | ||
| :::::You know that "I found some freely licensed" means: you found some files that anyone can reuse anywhere, anytime for every purpose including money making purposes? The files you found are actually published under a Creative Commons license with a non-commercial restriction. This means: the files you found are not freely license. The license you added on Wikimedia Commons was wrong, its not ] as you say but ]. --] (]) 12:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | :::::You know that "I found some freely licensed" means: you found some files that anyone can reuse anywhere, anytime for every purpose including money making purposes? The files you found are actually published under a Creative Commons license with a non-commercial restriction. This means: the files you found are not freely license. The license you added on Wikimedia Commons was wrong, its not ] as you say but ]. --] (]) 12:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::Actually, I was given permission by the photographer to post them. I'll ask him to change the license...I thought it was under the freely shared.--] (]) 05:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC) | ::::::Actually, I was given permission by the photographer to post them. I'll ask him to change the license...I thought it was under the freely shared.--] (]) 05:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::::::He was going to upload them himself, since they are his work, but now it's saying he can't at all, because it's been deleted? So now those files can never be uploaded again? This is really quite frustrating. I only wanted to make the page better. I give up. | :::::::He was going to upload them himself, since they are his work, but now it's saying he can't at all, because it's been deleted? So now those files can never be uploaded again, even if by the photographer? This is really quite frustrating. I only wanted to make the page better. I give up.--] (]) 06:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 06:05, 4 November 2012
| Skip to table of contents |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stevie Nicks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stevie Nicks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Idea of a Section on Future Plans Is Loco
The notion of having a section on "Future Plans" is a loco one - because this is supposed to be an encyclopedia of verifiable knowledge of things and events - and as such, "Future Plans" are completely irrelavent here, since the future is always in a state of change / unpredictability. Plans are always evanescent.
For example, Richard Nixon's plans for the rest of his second term as the President of the United States are irrelevant, and aren't documented here, since those plans never came to pass. They didn't have a chance, since Nixon resigned from the Presidency in 1974, well-before the end of his term.Dale101usa (talk) 18:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Section about work with other artists?
By this I mean backing vocals and duets. Generally, I wouldn't feel it necessary to include a section about this, but because Stevie has recorded with so many other musicians - John Stewart, Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers and Sheryl Crow to name a few, surely it would be informative to include a section about this? Any thoughts? --Laceandpaperflowers (talk) 23:36, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
Side Note: Excessive bias within the article
Whoever has wrote this article (particularly when discussing the later years of Stevie Nicks' career) has added so much personal opinion it becomes a little hard to read. This article could be extremely informative, as there is so much documented on Nicks' life and work, but instead it's filled with comments from Misplaced Pages such as "citation needed" and "original research?". For example, it may be obvious to a fan when listening to Nicks' work that her voice has gained a nasal quality, lost some range etc. but how is that relevant? It's clear if you listen to her songs. Surely someone could rewrite parts of this article, with the appropriate media reports etc., and create a very good article that informs the reader in an impartial style, and is not biased to the opinions of fans or critics? --Laceandpaperflowers (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Be Bold and fix the problems you have identified. You have the ability to fix problems yourself. A new name 2008 (talk) 01:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
- Well i still haven't heard her later stuff, so no i didn't get to notice the change in her voice, so such stuff is informative to me. --Jerome Potts (talk) 22:27, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
Vocal Range
Just as HER article does for Christine McVie, this article says Stevie's vocal range is "contralto." Unless contralto covers a great deal of ground, they can't both be contraltos. Chrissy's voice is very different and her range seems to be centered at a different point. 76.28.103.69 (talk) 22:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Will in New Haven76.28.103.69 (talk) 22:32, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
- There are a couple of citations linked from Stevie's article that back up the claim that her vocal range is contralto. If you can find a reliable source that says what Christine's vocal range is, you can add it to the Christine McVie article. For now, I have added a "citation needed" flag to the Christine McVie article.- carolyn (user • talk) 23:37, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
-- Contralto does not just regard range, but also tone of voice and texture. Both Christine and Stevie seem to be more comfortable singing lower notes, and both of their voices have a rich, deep tone associated with contraltos. However, Christine has a wider range than Stevie. 79.64.250.72 (talk) 07:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Yahoo! interview
Where's this Yahoo! interview? Was it in Yahoo! magazine or online? Family Guy Guy (talk) 13:40, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Lucrezia Santini
Blackbird, Rhiannon, Midnight Special video performance mystical magical audience difficult to find, and well worth it. Haven't checked Buffy buster or bookstores, but had wondered about all the productions... Ms. Nicks seems like more of a Shaman to me, but languages and translations evolve, according to the voice of the people... peace. J.F.K., Nixon, Patton, Poe. starcharms ****75.201.20.42 (talk) 20:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
A New Album and Other Projects: 2010 ????
This section is just a rambling sentence about various twitter updates. This is a great article, needs some work, but this section is just horrible !!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.230.104.172 (talk) 02:45, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Well fix it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.97.87.69 (talk) 05:32, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
The composer/songwriter
Hey peeps in the know i'd like to find in this article some insight on how she comes up with songs : is she mostly a lyricist, or a composer ? I suppose both, since her songs are not attributed to anyone else, that i noticed. So then, does she start off with the lyrics and put music to it, like Elton John does with the lyrics provided to him, or the other way around ? Does she play an instrument, although not on stage ? If not, then how does she come up with the full orchestration of her melody ? I mean i don't wonder so much the same concerning Christine McVie or Lindsey Buckingham, since they are both instrumentalists. --Jerome Potts (talk) 22:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Generally, she would compose lyrics while forming rudimentary chords and melodies on a piano, or occasionally a guitar. For Fleetwood Mac songs, these demos were fleshed out by Buckingham, with occasional input from Christine McVie. Nicks got final say in how the songs were to sound, but that sound was generally created by Buckingham, though he was never credited as a co-writer. Her solo stuff was usually fleshed out by her co-writers or back-up musicians. Bretonbanquet (talk) 00:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's very much what i imagined, and it makes complete sense. I'll have to check out her solo stuff at some point. Such information would do well in the article body (if sourced, of course). --Jerome Potts (talk) 18:31, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Vandalism
Someone redirected this article to Goat and I reverted it, but now it says REDIRECT Goat at the top of the page and I'm not entirely sure how to remove that, as it doesn't show up in the source. Sorry about that. Jenrzzz (talk) 09:14, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed the goat issue. That was strange. Jenrzzz (talk) 09:16, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
A younger photo request
1979 was 33 years ago at this writing. Is it possible to include a photo of her from this era? She is, after all, a frontwoman, and her image is important. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.88.143.1 (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
- I found some freely licensed ones I could upload if everyone is okay with it...--Amandallc (talk) 04:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent. Any more? -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 10:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- There actually are a few more. I uploaded a couple more recent ones to Wikimedia Commons, as well as a couple more from the 70s era. I'll add a couple more to the bio.--Amandallc (talk) 04:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Many thanks. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 08:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- You know that "I found some freely licensed" means: you found some files that anyone can reuse anywhere, anytime for every purpose including money making purposes? The files you found are actually published under a Creative Commons license with a non-commercial restriction. This means: the files you found are not freely license. The license you added on Wikimedia Commons was wrong, its not commons:Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0 as you say but commons:Template:cc-by-nc-sa-2.0. --Martin H. (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I was given permission by the photographer to post them. I'll ask him to change the license...I thought it was under the freely shared.--Amandallc (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- He was going to upload them himself, since they are his work, but now it's saying he can't at all, because it's been deleted? So now those files can never be uploaded again, even if by the photographer? This is really quite frustrating. I only wanted to make the page better. I give up.--Amandallc (talk) 06:05, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, I was given permission by the photographer to post them. I'll ask him to change the license...I thought it was under the freely shared.--Amandallc (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
- You know that "I found some freely licensed" means: you found some files that anyone can reuse anywhere, anytime for every purpose including money making purposes? The files you found are actually published under a Creative Commons license with a non-commercial restriction. This means: the files you found are not freely license. The license you added on Wikimedia Commons was wrong, its not commons:Template:Cc-by-sa-2.0 as you say but commons:Template:cc-by-nc-sa-2.0. --Martin H. (talk) 12:28, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Many thanks. -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 08:25, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- There actually are a few more. I uploaded a couple more recent ones to Wikimedia Commons, as well as a couple more from the 70s era. I'll add a couple more to the bio.--Amandallc (talk) 04:43, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent. Any more? -- Gareth Griffith-Jones/The Welsh Buzzard 10:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (musicians) articles
- Top-importance biography (musicians) articles
- Musicians work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- B-Class Rock music articles
- Top-importance Rock music articles
- WikiProject Rock music articles
- B-Class United States articles
- High-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of High-importance
- B-Class American music articles
- Top-importance American music articles
- WikiProject American music articles
- B-Class Arizona articles
- Top-importance Arizona articles
- WikiProject Arizona articles
- WikiProject United States articles