Misplaced Pages

Template:Cite newsgroup: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:26, 9 May 2006 view sourceLigulem (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers28,245 edits using a box for the usage warning← Previous edit Revision as of 09:37, 9 May 2006 view source Melchoir (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users32,110 editsm puncNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:
|- |-
|align="center"|] |align="center"|]
|align="left" width="95%"|Please do '''not''' apply this template to use a newsgroup post to ] |align="left" width="95%"|Please do '''not''' apply this template to use a newsgroup post to ].
---- ----
According to ], According to ],

Revision as of 09:37, 9 May 2006

Error on call to Template:Cite newsgroup: parameter title required.


Comment Please do not apply this template to use a newsgroup post to verify content.

According to Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources,

"Posts to bulletin boards and Usenet, or messages left on blogs, are never acceptable as primary or secondary sources.
This is because we have no way of knowing who has written or posted them."

Accordingly, this template should never be included in the "References" section of an article.

This template employs intricate features of template syntax. You are encouraged to familiarise yourself with its setup and parser functions before editing the template. If your edit causes unexpected problems, please undo it quickly, as this template may appear on a large number of pages.
You can conduct experiments, and should test all major changes, in either this template's sandbox, the general template sandbox, or your user space before changing anything here.
Categories: