| Revision as of 17:51, 26 November 2012 editSusfele (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers3,720 edits Reporting 88.235.145.5. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:01, 26 November 2012 edit undoAnthonyMark00 (talk | contribs)92 edits →User-reportedNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| List begins BELOW this line --> | List begins BELOW this line --> | ||
| {{vandal|Ian.thomson}} | {{vandal|Ian.thomson}} | ||
| Is constantly removing evidence from the article (the publisher of the subjects materials) Which is also a primary source as they are mentioned in her books & lectures. He has not demonstrated this not to be the case. He continues to remove the evidence, and as he has stated it's because he does not agree with the views of the Publisher from his point of view. ] (]) 17:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | Is constantly removing evidence from the article (the publisher of the subjects materials) Which is also a primary source as they are mentioned in her books & lectures. He has not demonstrated this not to be the case. He continues to remove the evidence, and as he has stated it's because he does not agree with the views of the Publisher from his point of view. I have placed a vandalism report at the bottom of the article many time, but he just deletes them. What now?] (]) 17:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :{{AIV|nv}} ] ]] 17:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | :{{AIV|nv}} ] ]] 17:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *{{IPvandal|88.235.145.5}} – On ] ({{diff|Gideon Sundback|524982988|524981310|diff}}): vandalism after final warning. ] (]) 17:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | *{{IPvandal|88.235.145.5}} – On ] ({{diff|Gideon Sundback|524982988|524981310|diff}}): vandalism after final warning. ] (]) 17:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:01, 26 November 2012
| Noticeboards | |
|---|---|
| Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
| General | |
| Articles, content | |
| Page handling | |
| User conduct | |
| Other | |
| Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards | |
Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.
Important!- The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
- Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
- The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
- If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
* {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
- Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
- Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
- This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 00:56 on 4 January 2025 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Reports
Bot-reported
User-reported
Ian.thomson (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Is constantly removing evidence from the article (the publisher of the subjects materials) Which is also a primary source as they are mentioned in her books & lectures. He has not demonstrated this not to be the case. He continues to remove the evidence, and as he has stated it's because he does not agree with the views of the Publisher from his point of view. I have placed a vandalism report at the bottom of the article many time, but he just deletes them. What now?AnthonyMark00 (talk) 17:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 17:40, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
- 88.235.145.5 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Gideon Sundback (diff): vandalism after final warning. Susfele (talk) 17:51, 26 November 2012 (UTC)