| Revision as of 12:30, 28 November 2012 editBoing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users96,327 edits →Warning← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:44, 28 November 2012 edit undoFrance2007 (talk | contribs)107 edits →WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| I will remove it immediatly. My point was that she clearly used an SPA. It seems that the page was already removed by Boing! said Zebedee.] (]) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | I will remove it immediatly. My point was that she clearly used an SPA. It seems that the page was already removed by Boing! said Zebedee.] (]) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :I've deleted the RFC and I have removed your disclosure of the person's personal details from the AfD. It is absolutely not permissible to publish any editor's personal details on Misplaced Pages, no matter what policies you might think they have broken - see ]. -- ] (]) 12:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | :I've deleted the RFC and I have removed your disclosure of the person's personal details from the AfD. It is absolutely not permissible to publish any editor's personal details on Misplaced Pages, no matter what policies you might think they have broken - see ]. -- ] (]) 12:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::I agree however I think the ] is more on her side trying to remove the |
::I agree however I think the ] is more on her side trying to remove the articles and constantly charging baith faith for any editor who does not agree with her.] (]) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :::It's pretty unlikely that trying to delete an article would be considered harassment - harassment is targeting editors personally, not targeting articles. -- ] (]) 12:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | :::It's pretty unlikely that trying to delete an article would be considered harassment - harassment is targeting editors personally, not targeting articles. -- ] (]) 12:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::::If I might add a comment, I think this editor was trying to point out that editor Rangell has asked for French sites on the House du Souich page and then seems to have subsequently deleted the French wiki sites speaking of the family: one for the page on regional coat of arms and another for the image of the coat of arms itself. She needs to leave the French sources alone so that FRENCH wiki editors can comment. That is where I see the impartiality come into play. Besides the point that she accuses SPA and then does it herself. It probably isn't harrassment but its certianly not good faith editing either.--] (]) 12:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:44, 28 November 2012
Welcome
|
In response to your feedback
See WP:Dispute.
Ariconte (talk) 23:30, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
Warning
I don't plan to comment on your RFC or AFD commentary itself but you have clearly outed another editor's private home address. This will almost certainly get you blocked - posting someone's personal details is not okay, regardless of the context. Please see WP:HARASSMENT. I strongly suggest you remove the details from the three places you published them. Stalwart111 11:53, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
I've posted a note at ANI to get an admin to remove it properly. Stalwart111 12:14, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I will remove it immediatly. My point was that she clearly used an SPA. It seems that the page was already removed by Boing! said Zebedee.Matt 800 (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I've deleted the RFC and I have removed your disclosure of the person's personal details from the AfD. It is absolutely not permissible to publish any editor's personal details on Misplaced Pages, no matter what policies you might think they have broken - see WP:OUTING. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I agree however I think the Misplaced Pages:Harrassment is more on her side trying to remove the articles and constantly charging baith faith for any editor who does not agree with her.Matt 800 (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's pretty unlikely that trying to delete an article would be considered harassment - harassment is targeting editors personally, not targeting articles. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- If I might add a comment, I think this editor was trying to point out that editor Rangell has asked for French sites on the House du Souich page and then seems to have subsequently deleted the French wiki sites speaking of the family: one for the page on regional coat of arms and another for the image of the coat of arms itself. She needs to leave the French sources alone so that FRENCH wiki editors can comment. That is where I see the impartiality come into play. Besides the point that she accuses SPA and then does it herself. It probably isn't harrassment but its certianly not good faith editing either.--France2007 (talk) 12:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's pretty unlikely that trying to delete an article would be considered harassment - harassment is targeting editors personally, not targeting articles. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I agree however I think the Misplaced Pages:Harrassment is more on her side trying to remove the articles and constantly charging baith faith for any editor who does not agree with her.Matt 800 (talk) 12:27, 28 November 2012 (UTC)