| Revision as of 23:56, 8 December 2012 editElen of the Roads (talk | contribs)16,638 edits →User talk:YOLO Swag/Userpage proposal: you're right← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:58, 8 December 2012 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,270 edits →User talk:YOLO Swag/Userpage proposal: Oh, for... Keep for the present.Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ::: <s>I didn't think that usually applied in userspace ...</s> --] (]) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From ] G4 ''A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent ].<sup>]]</sup> This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content ] for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Misplaced Pages's ]). This criterion also excludes content undeleted via ], or which was deleted via ] or speedy deletion (although in that case the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply).'' So yes, it could be speedied. ] (]) 23:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | ::: <s>I didn't think that usually applied in userspace ...</s> --] (]) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From ] G4 ''A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent ].<sup>]]</sup> This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content ] for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Misplaced Pages's ]). This criterion also excludes content undeleted via ], or which was deleted via ] or speedy deletion (although in that case the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply).'' So yes, it could be speedied. ] (]) 23:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per above. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 23:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per above. — <small><span style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 23:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Oh, for... Keep for the present.''' It's a subpage in userspace and is entitled "userpage proposal". Boney is trying to fix up his userpage so that it won't be deleted when it goes live, and is asking me for advice about how to fix it. It should be quite helpful to him if people give their views on it here, in a way, but, come on, it's a draft, a basis for alterations, does Misplaced Pages really need saving from it? What is the big deal if it sits inconspicuously in his userspace? If in the end he can't manage to fix it up so it becomes an acceptable userpage, he simply won't put it up. (Or, well, if he does, for I know he can be a bit stubborn like that, I'll promptly delete it myself.) It'll be harder for me to advise him if it's in his text editor, y'know. Could somebody please add one of those bits that I don't understand — you know, the formula which magicks a page so Google won't find it (so it won't hurt any real people mentioned), or something like that? And just let him work on it for a while? It's not like it's the only game ever played on Misplaced Pages, or even the only fake article in userspace. And don't ] me, now, please. ] | ] 23:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 8 December 2012
User talk:YOLO Swag/Userpage proposal
we're back to this game again - seeMisplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:NWA.Rep and Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:NWA.Rep/Andre DeAngelo Wallace Jr. This mentions at least one living person (Tila Tequila who is very unlikely ever to have dated this alter ego of Ryeinn/NWA.Rep/YOLO Swag]], and a number of other parties who could be pure fantasy (the life story recounted by this editor has varied considerably over time), but if they are real, this would be an unsourced BLP. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, BLP violations, WP:POLEMICal anti-Chinese statements, and lack of substantial change from the userpage that was snowball deleted by the community. Shrigley (talk) 23:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- identical recreation of article previously deleted through discussion - isnt that SPEEDY? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
I didn't think that usually applied in userspace ...--Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:52, 8 December 2012 (UTC) From WP:GCSD G4 A sufficiently identical and unimproved copy, having any title, of a page deleted via its most recent deletion discussion. This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies, and content moved to user space for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). This criterion also excludes content undeleted via deletion review, or which was deleted via proposed deletion or speedy deletion (although in that case the previous speedy criterion, or other speedy criteria, may apply). So yes, it could be speedied. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:56, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- identical recreation of article previously deleted through discussion - isnt that SPEEDY? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 23:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per above. — Ched : ? 23:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, for... Keep for the present. It's a subpage in userspace and is entitled "userpage proposal". Boney is trying to fix up his userpage so that it won't be deleted when it goes live, and is asking me for advice about how to fix it. It should be quite helpful to him if people give their views on it here, in a way, but, come on, it's a draft, a basis for alterations, does Misplaced Pages really need saving from it? What is the big deal if it sits inconspicuously in his userspace? If in the end he can't manage to fix it up so it becomes an acceptable userpage, he simply won't put it up. (Or, well, if he does, for I know he can be a bit stubborn like that, I'll promptly delete it myself.) It'll be harder for me to advise him if it's in his text editor, y'know. Could somebody please add one of those bits that I don't understand — you know, the formula which magicks a page so Google won't find it (so it won't hurt any real people mentioned), or something like that? And just let him work on it for a while? It's not like it's the only game ever played on Misplaced Pages, or even the only fake article in userspace. And don't OTHERCRAPEXISTS me, now, please. Bishonen | talk 23:58, 8 December 2012 (UTC).