| Revision as of 08:34, 12 May 2006 editVizjim (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers5,956 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:59, 12 May 2006 edit undoBrian G. Crawford (talk | contribs)1,541 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 95: | Line 95: | ||
| ] 08:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | ] 08:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==Why don't you build me up buttercup, why don't you say you will?== | |||
| And then worst of all baby I don't know if you say you will.. i need pou, I don't know if you do know, I don't kno wif you were to start, why don't you build me up buttercup, just make me start, why don't you huild me up babyk dont you let me donw,k y09ou sely you woj't still and then owrst of all you say woul dont b aby when uyou say ou will ane I love you stiill Ineedyou and thin I own tif I wont love y9o the satart | |||
Revision as of 08:59, 12 May 2006
See the archive of my talk page here:
Kyle L I do take the vote personally, becuase it's not an advertisement, we were literal when we created that page. We are trying to make a show, and I would enjoy it if we had a small article. This is rediculous. I'm sick of people mocking us just becuase we aren't on any network.
Kindness noted
Hello Richardcavell : ) I noticed your kind comment. Just what the situation needed. Thank you for doing it. FloNight 23:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC) Irrelevant support - Mate, pull this request out before you get a disheartening pile-on. Edit count minimums have gone way up - it's somewhere over 3000 edits now. - Richardcavell 22:57, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
for reverting my user page for me. I'm on vandal patrol a fair bit of my time here. That's the first time someones actually attacked me personally for rv'ing their propagandas and personal agendas. It just lets me know I'm doing something right! Again, thanks for covering me! Cheers and take care! Anger22 23:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Harold Lunz
I guess you adopted an unorthodox process, but I agree with your action in rescuing that article. I voted Keep, and I expect the article will survive this time. Cheers! Metamagician3000 13:31, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
Regarding Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of religions once classed as cults...
Would you consider changing your vote to keep the information if it were merged with List of groups referred to as cults or expanded into a broader topic: "The Transition from Cult to Religion." That might make a very interesting wikipedia article. cairoi 17:46, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
A landslide victory for The JPS (aka RFA thanks)
| Hey, Richardcavell, thank you so much for your vote and comments in my RfA, which passed with an overwhelming consensus of 95/2/2. I was very surprised and flattered that the community has entrusted me with these lovely new toys. I ripped open the box and started playing with them as soon as I got them, and I've already had the pleasure of deleting random nonsense/attacks/copyvios tonight. If I ever do anything wrong, or can help in some way, please feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, and I will do my best to correct my mistake, or whatever... Now, to that bottle of wine waiting for me... |
|
Harold Luntz
When I deleted the article it was nominated as a speedy delete. At that time, there was nothing that I saw in the article that asserted meeting WP:BIO. That's why it was deleted. Vegaswikian 23:29, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
82.198.250.80
Thanks. You had me confused for a second as the last numbers should have been 249 not 259. I see that 82.198.250.80 is out of London and 194.8.54.249 is Staffordshire. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
I find your lack of faith... disturbing.
Dear Richardcavell,
- Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your comments and constructive criticism, for every bit helps me become a better Wikipedian. I've started working on the things you brought up, and I hope that next time, things run better; who knows, maybe one day we'll be basking on the shore of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M o P-_ 22:03, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the support on my RfA!
| File:Danavecpurpletiger.jpg | A belated thank you to you for Supporting my RFA! It passed 54/2/3, much better than I expected! I am still finding my feet as an Administrator, and so far I am enjoying the experience. I am honoured that you felt I was ready to take up this position, and wish to thank you formally! I hope I can live up to your expectations of me. Once again, thank you! --Darth Deskana (talk page) 19:07, 4 May 2006 (UTC) |
My RFA
|
Hello Richardcavell, and thanks for supporting me on my recent request for adminship! It has succeeded with an unanimous support of 67 votes, so that I am now an administrator. Please feel free to leave a note on my talk page should you wish to leave any comments or ask for any help. Again, thanks a lot, AndyZ t 21:42, 5 May 2006 (UTC) |
Danke
This is probably the most inconsequential thank you'll ever lay your eyes on, but thanks for swining by my AfD on Dead city records. It's the first one I've done, and I feel more confident now that I know someone else is picking up what I'm throwing down. Consequentially 02:37, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Thank you!
|
|
Hello, Richardcavell, and thank you for vote on my recent RfA! With a final vote of 62/2/4, I have now been entrusted with the mop, bucket and keys. As I acclimate myself to my new tools, feel free to let me know how you believe I might be able to use them to help the project. Thanks again! RadioKirk talk to me 05:22, 6 May 2006 (UTC) |
User:JesseW/Recent Changes Slices
I noticed a comment you made suggesting something similar to this proposal, so I thought I'd drop a link to it for you, so we could coordinate our (small) efforts at getting it implemented. JesseW, the juggling janitor 01:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Preying from the Pulpit
In Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Preying from the Pulpit you suggested that we delete the article Preying from the Pulpit. 8 out of 10 people who commented there agreed with you and said we should remove the article by deleting or merging its content with First Baptist Church of Hammond. Now the admin that removed the AfD has placed a merge tag on the article instead. Can you please comment on the proposed merger of the article at Talk:First Baptist Church of Hammond#Merging with Preying from the Pulpit? Vivaldi (talk) 02:20, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Deletion log
I'll let you into a secret: I rarely look at the deletion log at all. When you get admin status on Misplaced Pages you can see the deleted edits of any article simply by pressing "History": they appear along with any of the current history of the given article. -- Francs2000 
21:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for voting on my RfA
|
Thanks so much for voting!Thanks so much for voting on my request for adminship. I have decided to withdraw my nomination as it seems that consensus will not be reached. If you voted in support, thanks for putting your trust in me to be a good admin. If you voted in opposition, thank you as well for your constructive criticism as it will only help me be a better Wikipedian and perhaps help if/when I apply for adminship again sometime in the future. |
Articles for deletion/Charlie Murphy's True Hollywood Stories: Rick James (2nd nomination)
Hi Richard,
You seem (going only by what you've written) to have vote to keep this article because you believe that it is the subject of endless nominations. As I said at the start of my renomination, the previous vote was closed down because the original proposer withdrew his vote in what appears, if you look at the conversation, to be little more than a fit of pique, when the vote was leaning towards delete or merge. That's the only reason I re-nominated.
I'm asking you to reconsider your vote based on the merits of the article, and defend it as such: your current comments make it look like my nomination was prompted by background politics, which is untrue and unfair. Not trying to sway your vote incidentally, just don't want it to be on a false basis.
Cheers!
Vizjim 08:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Why don't you build me up buttercup, why don't you say you will?
And then worst of all baby I don't know if you say you will.. i need pou, I don't know if you do know, I don't kno wif you were to start, why don't you build me up buttercup, just make me start, why don't you huild me up babyk dont you let me donw,k y09ou sely you woj't still and then owrst of all you say woul dont b aby when uyou say ou will ane I love you stiill Ineedyou and thin I own tif I wont love y9o the satart