| Revision as of 09:58, 21 December 2002 editMintguy (talk | contribs)11,899 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:58, 21 December 2002 edit undoMintguy (talk | contribs)11,899 edits forgot sigNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| It's usually "" rather than "". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --] 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC) | It's usually "" rather than "". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --] 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC) | ||
| :I'm suprised by this. Putting ''site:uk'' into the search reduces the differential, but it still puts Lockerbie bombing ahead. | :I'm suprised by this. Putting ''site:uk'' into the search reduces the differential, but it still puts Lockerbie bombing ahead. ] | ||
Revision as of 09:58, 21 December 2002
In Britain this is usually referred to as the 'Lockerbie disaster'. I was tempted to move this page to that but, i'm wondering if it is usually referred to as 'Pan Am 103' in the US?
Lockerbie at the moment redirects to this page, which means the reference to Lockerbie found on this page refers to itself. I plan to make the page listed as Lockerbie have some brief information about the town and refer to the disaster. Is this acceptable to US readers? Mintguy 17:10 Sep 5, 2002 (PDT)
- The little TV news reporter in my head is saying "Pan Am flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988". Certainly the particular phrase "Lockerbie disaster" is unfamiliar. --Brion 16:21 Sep 10, 2002 (UTC)
- I've always known it as "Pan Am 103" too. A redirect from from Lockerbie disaster would be appropriate. --Stephen Gilbert 00:42 Sep 11, 2002 (UTC)
It's usually "Lockerbie bombing" rather than "Lockerbie disaster". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --Zundark 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC)
- I'm suprised by this. Putting site:uk into the search reduces the differential, but it still puts Lockerbie bombing ahead. Mintguy