Misplaced Pages

Talk:Pan Am Flight 103/Archive 8: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Pan Am Flight 103 Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:23, 21 December 2002 editMav (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users77,874 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 10:27, 21 December 2002 edit undoMintguy (talk | contribs)11,899 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 14: Line 14:


There was no bombing in Lockerbie. The bomb was on the plane. Lockerbie was where (most of the plane) crashed. The focus here really should be the plane and not where the plane happened to crash. --] There was no bombing in Lockerbie. The bomb was on the plane. Lockerbie was where (most of the plane) crashed. The focus here really should be the plane and not where the plane happened to crash. --]

:: Mav that's actually quite offensive! 11 Lockerbie residents died! ]

Revision as of 10:27, 21 December 2002

In Britain this is usually referred to as the 'Lockerbie disaster'. I was tempted to move this page to that but, i'm wondering if it is usually referred to as 'Pan Am 103' in the US?

Lockerbie at the moment redirects to this page, which means the reference to Lockerbie found on this page refers to itself. I plan to make the page listed as Lockerbie have some brief information about the town and refer to the disaster. Is this acceptable to US readers? Mintguy 17:10 Sep 5, 2002 (PDT)

The little TV news reporter in my head is saying "Pan Am flight 103, which exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988". Certainly the particular phrase "Lockerbie disaster" is unfamiliar. --Brion 16:21 Sep 10, 2002 (UTC)
I've always known it as "Pan Am 103" too. A redirect from from Lockerbie disaster would be appropriate. --Stephen Gilbert 00:42 Sep 11, 2002 (UTC)

It's usually "Lockerbie bombing" rather than "Lockerbie disaster". (The linked Google searches confirm this.) --Zundark 09:45 Dec 21, 2002 (UTC)

I'm suprised by this. Putting site:uk into the search reduces the differential, but it still puts Lockerbie bombing ahead. Mintguy
It's called The Lockerbie disaster by the Edinburgh Law Review. Mintguy

There was no bombing in Lockerbie. The bomb was on the plane. Lockerbie was where (most of the plane) crashed. The focus here really should be the plane and not where the plane happened to crash. --mav

Mav that's actually quite offensive! 11 Lockerbie residents died! Mintguy