| Revision as of 16:49, 27 March 2006 editBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 edits common sense is rather uncommon← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:22, 12 May 2006 edit undoBhadani (talk | contribs)204,742 editsm a welcome note at the topNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {| class="messagebox standard-talk" | |||
| |- | |||
| |<center> <font size="+1">Welcome to the discussion</center></font> | |||
| |} | |||
| ---- | |||
| ==About this page== | ==About this page== | ||
Revision as of 15:22, 12 May 2006
About this page
This page was created as a fork of Ignore all rules. Some felt there wasn't enough detail in "IAR" as it as called and others wanted to maintain its brief original form. This fork was created to expand more on the concepts of IAR. For a complete history, see the IAR talk page. --Wgfinley 05:00, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- I think the Monty Hall problem shows that the idea behind this policy is flawed.Geni 22:54, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. There's no common sense. Zocky | picture popups 12:25, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- It isn't supposed to be policy at all. --LBMixPro 02:18, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Coomon sense
I do agree – only problem faced (sometimes) is that common sense is rather uncommon. --Bhadani 16:49, 27 March 2006 (UTC)