| Revision as of 09:13, 20 December 2012 editMythsearcher (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,192 edits →Archangel class assault ship← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:26, 20 December 2012 edit undoNorth8000 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers84,256 edits →Archangel class assault shipNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] fictional spaceship - no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. ] ] 08:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ] fictional spaceship - no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. ] ] 08:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' I am surprised that this even survived the last AfD, even with tons of Gundam related sources on my shelves, I don't find this notable. Also, it seems like the last AfD consensus tends towards a merge or delete but only kept because who initiated the AfD was blocked. But again, it simply showed that ''I like Gundam'' comment in the other AfD a complete lie. Just another ] and ] type of mass AfD wiki user. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by</small> ]<sup>]</sup> 09:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' I am surprised that this even survived the last AfD, even with tons of Gundam related sources on my shelves, I don't find this notable. Also, it seems like the last AfD consensus tends towards a merge or delete but only kept because who initiated the AfD was blocked. But again, it simply showed that ''I like Gundam'' comment in the other AfD a complete lie. Just another ] and ] type of mass AfD wiki user. <small>—Preceding ] comment added by</small> ]<sup>]</sup> 09:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Zero wp:notability-suitable references on this fictional ship type. <font color ="#0000cc">''North8000''</font> (]) 12:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:26, 20 December 2012
Archangel class assault ship
AfDs for this article:- Archangel class assault ship (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable fictional spaceship - no significant coverage in third party reliable sources. Claritas § 08:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I am surprised that this even survived the last AfD, even with tons of Gundam related sources on my shelves, I don't find this notable. Also, it seems like the last AfD consensus tends towards a merge or delete but only kept because who initiated the AfD was blocked. But again, it simply showed that I like Gundam comment in the other AfD a complete lie. Just another WP:IDONTKNOWIT and WP:IDONTLIKEIT type of mass AfD wiki user. —Preceding signed comment added by MythSearcher 09:13, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Zero wp:notability-suitable references on this fictional ship type. North8000 (talk) 12:26, 20 December 2012 (UTC)