Misplaced Pages

Talk:Titan (supercomputer): Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:14, 28 December 2012 editJames086 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users46,465 editsm b class article← Previous edit Revision as of 00:56, 1 January 2013 edit undoGA bot (talk | contribs)126,241 editsm Transcluding GA reviewNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=high}} {{WikiProject Computing|class=B|importance=high}}
{{GA nominee|10:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)|nominator=<font color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</sup>|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=|note=}} {{GA nominee|10:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)|nominator=<font color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</sup>|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=onreview|note=}}
==Programming model== ==Programming model==
Could we have something about the programming model and operating system for this computer. How is the parallelism exploited? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> Could we have something about the programming model and operating system for this computer. How is the parallelism exploited? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Line 10: Line 10:


:I doubt it, I can't find a source to link the two. I think it's just due to it's ''titanic'' processing power. <font color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</sup> 19:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC) :I doubt it, I can't find a source to link the two. I think it's just due to it's ''titanic'' processing power. <font color="#454545">]</font><sup>]</sup> 19:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

{{Talk:Titan (supercomputer)/GA1}}

Revision as of 00:56, 1 January 2013

WikiProject iconComputing B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Titan (supercomputer) is currently a Computing and engineering good article nominee. Nominated by James086 at 10:55, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.


Programming model

Could we have something about the programming model and operating system for this computer. How is the parallelism exploited? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.40.243.42 (talk) 23:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

I'll see what I can find. James086 14:51, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Name inspiration?

Was Titan inspired by the Deus Ex mod 2027? IIRC, there is an AI in the mod named Titan and one of the endings is merging with it. --213.206.235.34 (talk) 12:02, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

I doubt it, I can't find a source to link the two. I think it's just due to it's titanic processing power. James086 19:40, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Titan (supercomputer)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: W.D. (talk · contribs) 00:48, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Seems like it meets MoS
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Refs seem reliable and all OK
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Seems good to go, well written.
Categories: