Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment/Requests: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Puerto Rico | Assessment Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:26, 2 January 2013 editAhnoneemoos (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,167 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 08:17, 2 January 2013 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,373,836 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment/Requests/Archives/2012/December. (BOT)Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


==]==

Gente, I need your honest reassessment. At the suggestion of ], I've almost given birth to a Betances clone... The article had a B rating before I put my hands on it. I want to improve the article's rating to Featured Article status, and have since submitted it to WikiProject peer review. However, since you're part of the concerned party, so to speak, feel free to fire away(!) Methinks it deserves an A, but I'm biased. ''Wink, wink...'' Of course, if this paragraph doesn't belong here, move it and let me know where it belongs. ] 20:53, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

*Great job! I believe that it would do great in peer review, but you know me, what do I know? (smile). ] 20:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
::Gracias, but what about Puerto Rico WikiProject ratings? I'd suggest High or Top importance... as quality goes, I've done my research for about an hour or so, and it probably deserves an GA, maybe even an A, but not Featured status yet. My wife is about to strangle me, all I do is talk about the guy since Thursday... ;-) ] 21:26, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
* Not Top-importance, that is reserved for core topics (i.e. ]); maybe High, due to his historical and internationally renowned impact and influences. But GOOD WORK, by the way. The article is really good. As Tony says, throw it through Peer Review; after that, I think it'll easily pass as a Good Article, except for a few touches here and there. - <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt">] <sup><small>(]|]|])</small></sup></span> 21:58, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
::Therefore, the ratings and importance would be...?(bites nails nervously) ] 20:25, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

* I'd say High importance, this person is a notable historic subject which many students research from. As for quality, just put it as B to be conservative, but pass it through the GAN process. - <span style="font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 11pt">] <sup><small>(]|]|])</small></sup></span> 12:58, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:17, 2 January 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WikiProject Puerto Rico/Assessment/Requests redirect.
Puerto Rico articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 1 6 7
FL 1 2 4 7
FM 2 2
GA 7 16 64 87
B 15 82 150 176 7 430
C 24 103 217 484 42 870
Start 27 76 623 2,056 96 2,878
Stub 24 81 406 3,678 209 4,398
List 6 18 108 126 15 273
Category 1 1 1 2,957 2,960
Disambig 7 7
File 1,627 1,627
Portal 17 17
Project 20 20
Redirect 14 19 21 122 198 374
Template 330 330
NA 1 1 9 390 401
Other 27 27
Assessed 110 389 1,546 6,726 5,575 369 14,715
Unassessed 1 4 45 50
Total 111 389 1,546 6,730 5,575 414 14,765
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 45,751 Ω = 5.27

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.