Revision as of 09:39, 6 January 2013 editSjö (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers58,616 edits →Tax choice← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:45, 6 January 2013 edit undoXerographica (talk | contribs)2,148 edits →Tax choice: benefit principleNext edit → | ||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
:::I don't think this topic merits a subsection here. While notable, I think it falls into a very small minority when considering the broad topic of taxation and thus likely constitutes undue weight in this article. I do think it is fine for an article of its own and would be alright for a section in a sub-tax article like ]. If the content does stay, I'd suggest the sub-topic be changed to "tax reform" to make it a bit broader, with tax choice being a couple sentences of a larger point. ] <sup>]</sup> <small><i>14:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)</i></small> | :::I don't think this topic merits a subsection here. While notable, I think it falls into a very small minority when considering the broad topic of taxation and thus likely constitutes undue weight in this article. I do think it is fine for an article of its own and would be alright for a section in a sub-tax article like ]. If the content does stay, I'd suggest the sub-topic be changed to "tax reform" to make it a bit broader, with tax choice being a couple sentences of a larger point. ] <sup>]</sup> <small><i>14:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)</i></small> | ||
::::I agree with Morphh. There are a whole lot of ideas about better tax systems, but many of them are never put to use. I think that this article should cover the types of taxes and tax systems that are commonly used. ] (]) 09:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | ::::I agree with Morphh. There are a whole lot of ideas about better tax systems, but many of them are never put to use. I think that this article should cover the types of taxes and tax systems that are commonly used. ] (]) 09:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::Sorry for the delayed reply, ]. Our entire tax system is based on the ]...a problem which tax choice effectively solves. I think that's worth a paragraph or two. Please review all the references that I added to the ] entry. --] (]) 20:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:45, 6 January 2013
Tax was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 120 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
To-do list for Tax: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2007-02-19
|
Quick notes
just quick notes, since i don't have the time or background to write well on it...
purpose: fund-raising vs control/social-engineering/behavior-modification
types: inheritance; custom/import/duty; reseller's; property
related/see also: bonds; notes
capital gains tax
personal property tax
business inventory tax (includes busines equipment)
import taxes vs farm subsidies
stamp duty
revenue stamp
revenue paper
imputed interest/income tax (on zero coupon bonds)
and just for humor, "The Microsoft Tax"
thanks -- WP
Single rate with threshold
I believe that this page should at least mention the point that the combination of a single tax rate applied only on the excess of income/capital above a threshold will be result in a progressive tax in that the average rate of tax will increase with income/capital. An example is the income tax system which has operated in Sweden where a highly progressive tax is delivered by the combination of a high tax threshold and a single (high) tax rate. Alan Peakall 13:11 Oct 24, 2002 (UTC)
Inheritance taxes
"Inheritance taxes are extremely unpopular and many countries such as Canada and the United States have gotten rid of theirs or are in the process of doing so."
The first half of this is definitely not true. Personally I hate inheritance taxes too, but it's incorrect to assign that view to a majority of the residents of the US and Canada, especially with no time limitation. Many people find great satisfaction in knowing that the estate tax will punish 'the rich' on the assumption that the rich must have aquired their assets in some illicit or immoral manner. Envy has always been popular. Others argue in good faith that the estate tax is valuable in a social sense because it prevents families from becoming too powerful. And some argue that the estate tax saves the children of the wealthy from lives of unhappy idleness. Whatever the objective merits of those arguments, it is an objective fact that many people subjectively approve of inheritance taxes, regardless of whether they are objectively correct in doing so.
The quote's second half is also suspect. I don't know about Canada's inheritance tax, but the situation on the US Estate Tax is quite unclear. Most of the cuts in the federal tax have not really been cuts in federal revenue at all. Until the recent legislation, a portion of the revenue from the federal tax went to the states. The immediate change to the federal tax was to squeeze down on that money. The time has not yet come when the federal government will see serious reductions in its revenue from its estate tax. And many states are already considering state-level inheritance taxes independent of the federal tax to make up for the revenue they lost in the federal law change.
So it's much too broad to claim that the US is in the process of getting rid of its estate tax. There are reductions scheduled at the federal level, but those have not yet begun to really take hold. There is a scheduled repeal of the federal tax, but that lasts for only one year under rules that practically guarantee that Congress will revisit the issue. And it's entirely likely that many states will impose their own inheritance taxes, as they did before the federal government invented one.
I hate to cut the whole sentence because I don't really know what's going on in Canada. But I don't know how to rewrite it to make it true. On balance it's probably better to cut what I know is false than to leave something that might be true.
---
Well, in my opinion inheritance tax is a perfect tax - because you never actually pay it yourself. I suppose I'd better get over to inheritance to discuss the morality of the institution itself but as far as I am concerned if I inherit anything it is a windfall so I don't see why I shouldn't pay tax on it, since I pay tax on income I have earned or gain from dividends or capital gains. What's "envy" got to do with it? If one accepts that taxes are necessary (and of course it is possible to argue they are not) it makes sense for those with more money to pay more.
Exile ---
Fair Tax
Why is Fair Tax top of the list, and so blatantly propagandic (not to mention POV)...
- I am removing the entire section; it is blatant propaganda and it doesn't even mention what "Fair Tax" does tax (it's a consumption tax)
Economics of Taxing a Good
I just finished making some large edits to this section. I think some of the language was technically confusing and a little inaccurate--for example "goods" don't have elasticities, curves do. Also, some of the previous text seemed to imply the graphs showed taxes on consumers, but the tax is clearly on producers in the diagrams.
How is it that taxing profits does not alter the structure of production? Entrepreneurs make production decisions based fundamentally on their profit calculation that the value (price) of the produced good will exceed the value (costs) of its factors. Any tax on profits must be included in this calculation, and therefore affect both the quantity and the structure of production. If this is the argument of a particular school of thought, it should be attributed.
Why does everyone have to pay taxes?...thats not fair
Today!
Today taxes are due! Yay! Give America all the money!
NPOV edit of propaganda
The following was excised from the article because nutty ideas and biased assertions of opinion don't belong here:
Toll Tax
A Toll Tax is a tax that is collected anonymously and though this type of tax has been often used historically on roads and bridges, this type of tax has not been implemented as a sole or major revenue provider.
The greatest advantage to a toll tax being used as a sole provider of tax revenue that along with the anonymity it provides, the ability to automate allows for removal of the burden of tax regulation and collection.
The best example of this tax as a sole source tax is the: No Names No Numbers Tax which through such automation removes not only Internal Revenue Service and its huge tax burdens of regulation and bureaucracy; but removes both compliance costs a additional related tax burden that the people incur to comply with complicated tax regulations; and takes the crime of tax evasion which costs tax payers millions each year to incarcerate and keep such tax offenders; Turning the offense into a minimal traffic offense.
Through this tax all other taxes are abolished but for import which states collect for the federal government for it's operation, and use taxes which are limited to a particular use such as the gas tax for roads. Contribution by the American Patriot Party.
Taxation as a Political Pawn and Invasive Tool of Government
Taxation used for political posturing is often used to finance programs that will benefit the constituents of a particular political party.
Democrats and Republicans use taxes to finance social programs that benefit larger bureaucracies and to finance projects that benefit large constituent companies.
Both use the higher or lower tax stance to increase tax revenue ether by increased forced taxation or by increasing profitability through the greater economic growth. Neither has ever attempted to actually limit itself to tax based on the consent of the tax payer or to the minimal need of government to function. This is due to the 16th Amendment first deemed unconstitutional by the supreme court and later made as an amendment to make it so called "constitutional".
This gave the federal government a unlimited power to tax the general public and over throw the meanings of the 17th Grievance of the Declaration of Independence. With this power, Security of ones person, papers and effects became in jeopardy as the federal government through the use of income tax created a method to invade all affairs of business within the United States and that enters and leaves the United States. Contribution by the American Patriot Party.
Maybe we need a article regarding the politics of taxation...
Added Toll Tax and Use Tax (simple)
Needs expanding.
User: Richard Taylor APP
backward economies of India, Africa, et al
What exactly defines a "backward economy"? Isn't that more of an opinion? The world bank generally differentiates economies based on income. "Low income economies" might be more fitting.
"Purposes and effects" versus "Economic effects"
Should "Purposes and effects" be a separate section from "Economic effects"? Paum89 (talk) 18:08, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
Tax choice
In addition to the section lacking sources, it might be even more difficult to find a source that this is a non-FRINGE view. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 08:11, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- It's been featured twice in Forbes (1, 2), once in the Atlantic (1)...and featured in other credible publications. It's obviously not a mainstream view but it certainly merits at least one paragraph in this article. --Xerographica (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- All the sources you list here seem to be columns (representing only the opinion of the author) or Op-Ed pieces. Any notability is at first remove; the publication thinks the author is "notable" (or interesting), and the author thinks the concept is notable (or interesting). Still, that problem relates to the article Tax choice, as well. The tag should remain until (at least one) WP:RS is found. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think this topic merits a subsection here. While notable, I think it falls into a very small minority when considering the broad topic of taxation and thus likely constitutes undue weight in this article. I do think it is fine for an article of its own and would be alright for a section in a sub-tax article like tax reform. If the content does stay, I'd suggest the sub-topic be changed to "tax reform" to make it a bit broader, with tax choice being a couple sentences of a larger point. Morphh 14:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with Morphh. There are a whole lot of ideas about better tax systems, but many of them are never put to use. I think that this article should cover the types of taxes and tax systems that are commonly used. Sjö (talk) 09:39, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think this topic merits a subsection here. While notable, I think it falls into a very small minority when considering the broad topic of taxation and thus likely constitutes undue weight in this article. I do think it is fine for an article of its own and would be alright for a section in a sub-tax article like tax reform. If the content does stay, I'd suggest the sub-topic be changed to "tax reform" to make it a bit broader, with tax choice being a couple sentences of a larger point. Morphh 14:11, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
- All the sources you list here seem to be columns (representing only the opinion of the author) or Op-Ed pieces. Any notability is at first remove; the publication thinks the author is "notable" (or interesting), and the author thinks the concept is notable (or interesting). Still, that problem relates to the article Tax choice, as well. The tag should remain until (at least one) WP:RS is found. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for the delayed reply, I was blocked for a week. Our entire tax system is based on the preference revelation problem...a problem which tax choice effectively solves. I think that's worth a paragraph or two. Please review all the references that I added to the benefit principle entry. --Xerographica (talk) 20:45, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Top-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- B-Class Economics articles
- Top-importance Economics articles
- WikiProject Economics articles
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- B-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists