Misplaced Pages

Talk:Spani family: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:12, 7 January 2013 editAntidiskriminator (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers58,480 edits Latest edits: minor clarification← Previous edit Revision as of 08:40, 7 January 2013 edit undoAigest (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,029 edits Latest editsNext edit →
Line 66: Line 66:
::::Its author is ] a ]n historian and member of the ]. He was an expert in history of medieval ] and the ]'s policy toward its coastal areas. ::::Its author is ] a ]n historian and member of the ]. He was an expert in history of medieval ] and the ]'s policy toward its coastal areas.
::::'''Conclusion''': the Greek origin assertion of Spani family is supported with multiple reliable sources. I provided requested details, i.e. author and the title of the text published in Glas (written by professional historian specialized in the subject). Taking that in consideration the Greek origin assertion should be restored. --] (]) 00:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC) ::::'''Conclusion''': the Greek origin assertion of Spani family is supported with multiple reliable sources. I provided requested details, i.e. author and the title of the text published in Glas (written by professional historian specialized in the subject). Taking that in consideration the Greek origin assertion should be restored. --] (]) 00:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
:::::Provide full citation from Ivan Bozic and the reference he is using. I suspect the source is Milan Sufflay and you are using him three times, making it look like there are numerous sources while in fact there is only Milan Sufflay. You are POV pushing based on only one source. The text will be reverted accordingly ] (]) 08:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 08:40, 7 January 2013

WikiProject iconAlbania Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconSpani family is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Misplaced Pages visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion of the cited additions of others

Unresolved

@ZjarriRrethues: You removed cited information about the ethnicity of members of Spani family.

Sources:

You explained your removal by writing in edit line: please don't make POV/OR deductions, I've already added that below. I am afraid that what you wrote is not true. The only removed information you added to the body of the article was the information about the meaning of the family name (beardles), but you did not add below the removed information about the ethnicity of Spani. Was this a mistake? In case this was not a mistake please explain your point. Let me remind you that what you did can be seen as a form of tendentious editing: removal of statements that are pertinent, sourced reliably, and written in a neutral style constitutes disruption and you are already warned not to engage in further: "ethno-nationalist tendentious editing--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:25, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

The issue, which you analyzed in one word has been dealt with and explained by the use of modern sources in a complete section and without deductions that make little common sense. Btw misquoting and misattributing 1+ year old discussions is something that you have done before and you were warned by an admin about it when I was reviewing Gaius's GAN. --— ZjarriRrethues —  19:42, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  1. Will you present the text from the "complete section" you mention which contains information about the Greek ethnicity of the Spani family?
  2. Will you present the diff with administrator warning me for misquoting and misattributing 1+ year old discussions when you were reviewing Gaius's GAN?--Antidiskriminator (talk) 20:52, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
and btw your somewhat modern sources don't mention the family but two members. Of course if you read the members section, there is a whole section about the legendary claims to imperial Byzantine origins from some members.--— ZjarriRrethues —  19:41, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
You did not answer my questions. Please answer my questions.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
I replied on your talkpage too, so I can't/won't contribute anything else to this OR discussion i.e please stick to the modern and complete sources.--— ZjarriRrethues —  10:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

You did write a message on my talk page, but you did not answer my questions.

In the meantime you continued with disruptive tendentious editing and removal cited addition about the Greek origin of the Spani family either directly or by misusing of the page moving.

Misplaced Pages:Moving a page guide explains how to move a page. You did not follow it.

You misused moving of the page to delete cited addition of other users which can be seen as Misplaced Pages:Tendentious editing by someone who does not AGF.

You removed the cited information about Greek origin of Spani family with this edit under false excuse that you added removed text about the Greek origin of the Spani family into the body of the article, which is not true. Although I reminded you that what you did can be seen as a form of tendentious editing because removal of statements that are pertinent, sourced reliably, and written in a neutral style constitutes disruption and that you are already warned not to engage in further: "ethno-nationalist tendentious editing you continued with the same behaviour, falsely accused me, ignored my questions, misused moving of the page to delete my cited addition and refuse to discuss your edits.

You removed the same cited addition in other articles like here under false excuse that you explained that removal on the Talk:Spani family which you did not.

  1. Please stop your disruptive tendentious editing and follow wikipedia rules.
  2. Please answer my above two questions--Antidiskriminator (talk) 10:46, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
It's been almost 9 months and I hadn't noticed that you had this piece back. The version as it was written was much more precise as it applied to just a few members, whose "imperial" claims of ancestry were disputed and vague.--— ZjarriRrethues —  22:29, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Skanderbeg and other chieftains from the region of Albania were Alfonso's vassals

Resolved

There is scientific consensus (which includes Albanian nationalistic sources) that Skanderbeg became vassal after signing the Treaty of Gaeta. When other chieftains from the region of Albania signed similar treaties they also became vassals of Kingdom of Naples:

....

Therefore, based on the above presented sources, I will return information about vassalage to Naples, removed by Aigest.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Latest edits

Are non-consensual and oversimplified. Specialized sources state things more clearly Aigest (talk) 21:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Several sources are presented to support the Greek origin assertion. One of the sources I provided is written by the most specialized author for this topic (Schmitt) who confirmed the Greek origin assertion. Removal of cited addition of other editors is disruptive especially with false excuses. There are no "specialized sources" which contradict this assertion. Please revert yourself.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Stavrides explains the "legitimacy claims" in a very detailed manner, unlike century old sources that have been reused by Schmitt and a Serbian source, of which (during a whole year of reverting) you still haven't provided the basic source details like the title of the paper and its author.--— ZjarriRrethues —  00:32, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
No. This is not about "legitimacy claims" but about ethnic origin of this family. It is not disputed by Stavrides and his text about Alessio Span. On the contrary. Therefore Shufflay and Schmitt are enough to support the Greek origin assertion. Here is another source which supports the Greek origin assertion:
  • Bulletin Scientifique: Sciences humaines, vol. 16–17, Le Conseil, 1980, p. 109, The Span are a family of Greek origin {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |editorn=, |laydate=, |editorn-last=, |coauthors=, |separator=, |laysummary=, |editorn-link=, |nopp=, |trans_title=, |month=, |editorn-first=, |doi_inactivedate=, |chapterurl=, |author-separator=, and |lastauthoramp= (help); Unknown parameter |firstn= ignored (help)
@Aigest, please revert yourself.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 23:37, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
The above text is also published in one work published on Serbian language.
  • Božić, Ivan (1980) , "Спани - Шпање", Glas (in Serbian), Belgrade: Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, p. 37, OCLC 183333221, СПАНИ — ШПАЊЕ Приказано на V скупу Одељења историјских наука 15. септембра 1976) Спани су били разграната породица грчког порекла, ко}а ]е у XV веку имала извесну улогу у друштвеном и политичном животу северне Албаније {{citation}}: Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laydate=, |separator=, |nopp=, |trans_title=, |doi_inactivedate=, |laysummary=, |chapterurl=, |month=, and |lastauthoramp= (help); More than one of |author= and |last= specified (help)
Its author is Ivan Božić (historian) a Yugoslavian historian and member of the Serbian Academy of Science and Arts. He was an expert in history of medieval Zeta and the Venetian Republic's policy toward its coastal areas.
Conclusion: the Greek origin assertion of Spani family is supported with multiple reliable sources. I provided requested details, i.e. author and the title of the text published in Glas (written by professional historian specialized in the subject). Taking that in consideration the Greek origin assertion should be restored. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 00:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Provide full citation from Ivan Bozic and the reference he is using. I suspect the source is Milan Sufflay and you are using him three times, making it look like there are numerous sources while in fact there is only Milan Sufflay. You are POV pushing based on only one source. The text will be reverted accordingly Aigest (talk) 08:40, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Categories: