| Revision as of 22:37, 17 April 2006 editMusical Linguist (talk | contribs)13,591 edits Deletion of your page← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:14, 14 May 2006 edit undo66.2.31.12 (talk) getting rid of old stuffNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| Please review ]. ] 18:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Re: ] == | == Re: ] == | ||
| Please do not remove users' comments on talk pages; it is considered vandalism. Thanks...] 20:04, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages under the ], which states that nobody may ] an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the ''effect'' of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR --> ] 20:11, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| You are in danger of violating the ]. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR2 --> ] 20:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | You are in danger of violating the ]. Please cease further reverts or you may be ] from further editing. <!-- Template:3RR2 --> ] 20:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Line 19: | Line 14: | ||
| I'm sorry to ask such a question, but there have been a lot of nasty attempts to game the system recently, and some very interesting things are being revealed. If it was a once-off, fourth revert, while accidentally logged off, we can certainly overlook it. On the ] article, we have always been very slow to report violations, especially with newcomers. But these things can be checked, so I'd urge you to be frank on this. It's not an accusation, by the way, just a question. Thanks. ] ] 23:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC) | I'm sorry to ask such a question, but there have been a lot of nasty attempts to game the system recently, and some very interesting things are being revealed. If it was a once-off, fourth revert, while accidentally logged off, we can certainly overlook it. On the ] article, we have always been very slow to report violations, especially with newcomers. But these things can be checked, so I'd urge you to be frank on this. It's not an accusation, by the way, just a question. Thanks. ] ] 23:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :I do not remember. | |||
| == 3RR == | |||
| You warned people about violating 3RR on ]? You've made 5 reverts in the last 24 hours. Watch yourself. --] 22:28, 16 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ]You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the ]. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. <!-- Template:3RR3 -->''']]''' <sup>(<em>]</em>)</sup> 18:41, 18 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion of your page == | == Deletion of your page == | ||
Revision as of 22:14, 14 May 2006
Re: Talk:Christianity
You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. Jkelly 20:24, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Can you clarify, please?
- 20:09 14 February, Kecik reverts
- 20:17 14 February, Kecik reverts
- 20:20 14 February, Kecik reverts
- 22:34 14 February, 208.54.15.129 reverts
Was that IP address yours when logged out?
I'm sorry to ask such a question, but there have been a lot of nasty attempts to game the system recently, and some very interesting things are being revealed. If it was a once-off, fourth revert, while accidentally logged off, we can certainly overlook it. On the Christianity article, we have always been very slow to report violations, especially with newcomers. But these things can be checked, so I'd urge you to be frank on this. It's not an accusation, by the way, just a question. Thanks. AnnH 23:56, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
- I do not remember.
Deletion of your page
Hi, Kecik. Your user page was deleted, and then one version of it was restored. This was in order to remove from the history a link which you added to a website which attacks other Wikipedians, and which claims to give their real names, etc. I want to warn you not to attempt to post that link again. Any user who deliberately posts information on Misplaced Pages which can be used to identify other editors or to give their location, or any other personal information about them without their consent will be blocked immediately, and the edit will be removed from the history of the page. Thanks for understanding. AnnH ♫ 22:37, 17 April 2006 (UTC)