Misplaced Pages

User talk:AmherstApple: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:09, 9 January 2013 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,562,826 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-ew}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit Revision as of 23:31, 9 January 2013 edit undoBelchfire (talk | contribs)4,207 edits January 2013: new sectionNext edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ► ]-] 21:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC) If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ► ]-] 21:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

== January 2013 ==

{{uw-ew|Randall L. Stephenson}} ► ]-] 23:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:31, 9 January 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Boy Scouts of America. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Belchfire-TALK 21:28, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Randall L. Stephenson. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Belchfire-TALK 23:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)