| Revision as of 12:02, 16 January 2013 editMaunus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers60,250 edits →Turkish language← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:27, 16 January 2013 edit undoE4024 (talk | contribs)7,905 edits →Data from RS: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Hi there. You don't speak Turkish, do you? --] (]) 11:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC) | Hi there. You don't speak Turkish, do you? --] (]) 11:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :No I don't.]·] 12:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC) | :No I don't.]·] 12:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Data from RS == | |||
| I saw your comments on Turkish lamguage. I agree that the said Factbook is not a reliable source for ethnic issues; not only because they do not have access to more information than anybody else but also because they have their own POV and could use the ''facts'' the way an organisation of that type would like to. Anyway, a POV-pushing user imposed that source for the infobox of Turkey and that issue could possibly attract your attention. All the best. --] (]) 13:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:27, 16 January 2013
Turkish language
Hi there. You don't speak Turkish, do you? --E4024 (talk) 11:25, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- No I don't.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 12:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Data from RS
I saw your comments on Turkish lamguage. I agree that the said Factbook is not a reliable source for ethnic issues; not only because they do not have access to more information than anybody else but also because they have their own POV and could use the facts the way an organisation of that type would like to. Anyway, a POV-pushing user imposed that source for the infobox of Turkey and that issue could possibly attract your attention. All the best. --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2013 (UTC)