Revision as of 22:31, 17 January 2013 editSandyGeorgia (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Mass message senders, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors278,985 edits →Réunion Ibis: O for now← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:35, 17 January 2013 edit undoFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,677 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
'''Oppose''' for now, expect to strike, multiple | '''Oppose''' for now, expect to strike, multiple | ||
# The '''Réunion Ibis''' (''Threskiornis solitarius'') is ... if the Threskiornis solitarius is an alternate name, it should be both bolded and italicized. | # The '''Réunion Ibis''' (''Threskiornis solitarius'') is ... if the Threskiornis solitarius is an alternate name, it should be both bolded and italicized. | ||
:::This isn't done on other featured animal articles, see for example ] and ]. ] (]) 22:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
# Images are facing off the page ... I believe the intent of the MOS guideline applies to both animals and people ... please juggle images so animals aren't looking off the page. | # Images are facing off the page ... I believe the intent of the MOS guideline applies to both animals and people ... please juggle images so animals aren't looking off the page. | ||
:::Onlæy one animal faces away (the one with multiple birds has several that face the text), but there isn't much to do about that single one, it doesn't fit anywhere else. I am well aware of the guideline. ] (]) 22:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
# In the mid 19th century, ... missing hyphen, pls review throughout. | # In the mid 19th century, ... missing hyphen, pls review throughout. | ||
# An alternate name is mentioned in the second paragraph; is it not possible to get that mentioned sooner? | # An alternate name is mentioned in the second paragraph; is it not possible to get that mentioned sooner? |
Revision as of 22:35, 17 January 2013
Réunion Ibis
Réunion Ibis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): FunkMonk (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
I am nominating this for featured article because I have added practically all known info about, most PD images, and presented all controversies relating to the bird, and it has also been copyedited. FunkMonk (talk) 16:31, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Source review - spotchecks not done
- FN5: publisher?
- FN9, 10: formatting
- Compare FNs 11 and 17. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:23, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- I think all these issues should be fixed now. FunkMonk (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support as per my good article review. A very strong article on a very interesting topic. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Images are fine; all PD. A few are not Commons-safe, but they are uploaded locally and appropriately tagged. J Milburn (talk) 22:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support I made a couple of minor edits, please check Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Review by SandyGeorgia
Oppose for now, expect to strike, multiple
- The Réunion Ibis (Threskiornis solitarius) is ... if the Threskiornis solitarius is an alternate name, it should be both bolded and italicized.
- This isn't done on other featured animal articles, see for example California Condor and Emperor Penguin. FunkMonk (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Images are facing off the page ... I believe the intent of the MOS guideline applies to both animals and people ... please juggle images so animals aren't looking off the page.
- Onlæy one animal faces away (the one with multiple birds has several that face the text), but there isn't much to do about that single one, it doesn't fit anywhere else. I am well aware of the guideline. FunkMonk (talk) 22:35, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- In the mid 19th century, ... missing hyphen, pls review throughout.
- An alternate name is mentioned in the second paragraph; is it not possible to get that mentioned sooner?
- The taxonomic history of the Réunion Ibis is very convoluted, ... is there a difference between "very convoluted" and "convoluted"? Please check for redundancy.
- It has been claimed that Bertrand-François Mahé de La Bourdonnais sent a "Solitaire" to France ... weasly ... by whom?
Just random checks, I stopped there, the article is not in bad shape, but some additional prose review would be helpful. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:31, 17 January 2013 (UTC)