| Revision as of 02:06, 22 January 2013 editUncle Milty (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers44,708 edits →Paul Ranni (entertainer): !D← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:41, 22 January 2013 edit undoNickaang (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users959 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| *'''Delete''' - Regardless of the nominator's actions, I am unable to find any independent reviews, interviews, or published commentary on the article subject. The refs in the article go to self-published sources and/or promotional PR pieces. Subject apparently isn't notable yet. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> ] | ] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 02:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - Regardless of the nominator's actions, I am unable to find any independent reviews, interviews, or published commentary on the article subject. The refs in the article go to self-published sources and/or promotional PR pieces. Subject apparently isn't notable yet. --<span style="outline:1px dotted #d1bfa4;"><font color="#ffffff">|</font> ] | ] <font color="#ffffff">|</font></span> 02:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Thanks, Jeff G. for pointing us and I agree with Uncle Milty. No significance now maybe later. Many thanks, ] (]) 14:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:41, 22 January 2013
Paul Ranni (entertainer)
- Paul Ranni (entertainer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not significant or noteworthy enough to have a Misplaced Pages page Todd Friedman (talk) 01:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: the nominator is a SPA who appears to be here only to disparage the reputation of the subject of that article. — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:34, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- That would perhaps be true if the subject had a reputation to be disparaged. Please consider whether or not this man is actually significant enough to be included on Misplaced Pages, because if the answer is yes, the amount of quasi-internet famous people worthy of their own page would skyrocket. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.179.159.84 (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete - Regardless of the nominator's actions, I am unable to find any independent reviews, interviews, or published commentary on the article subject. The refs in the article go to self-published sources and/or promotional PR pieces. Subject apparently isn't notable yet. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 02:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks, Jeff G. for pointing us and I agree with Uncle Milty. No significance now maybe later. Many thanks, NickAang (talk) 14:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)