Revision as of 23:32, 20 January 2013 editSarastro1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers22,211 edits GAN← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:35, 27 January 2013 edit undoGA bot (talk | contribs)126,241 editsm Transcluding GA reviewNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|23:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Language and literature|status=|note=}} | {{GA nominee|23:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC)|nominator=] (])|page=1|subtopic=Language and literature|status=onreview|note=}} | ||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Biography|living=No|class=|listas=Kilburn, Jim}} | {{WikiProject Biography|living=No|class=|listas=Kilburn, Jim}} | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=}} | {{WikiProject Journalism|class=}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Talk:Jim Kilburn/GA1}} |
Revision as of 23:35, 27 January 2013
Jim Kilburn is currently a Language and literature good article nominee. Nominated by Sarastro1 (talk) at 23:32, 20 January 2013 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Jim Kilburn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 23:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
Comments –
- Use ndashes (–) instead of hyphens (-) in dates' ranges.
- Well spotted: bad mistake! Fixed now. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- "He bowled fast-paced off spin." needs a ref.
- The ref was at the end of the next sentence. I've linked them to make it clear. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- You may link Barnsley Chronicle and the Yorkshire Post.
- Latter one done now, but I'd prefer to leave the Barnsley Chronicle as there is no article and I don't see the purpose of a red link for a borderline-notability article. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- "Kilburn's writings on the Yorkshire players of the 1930s and 1940s made them well-known to the public as personalities and he wrote several pieces for the Yorkshire Post which became well-known." comma after personalities
- You may link England team and Australia.
- Did the first; the second is not the team, and linking the country would be overlinking. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Don't you think the Bibliography section needs a ref?
- For a bibliography section, the books serve as their own reference, as I understand it. Sarastro1 (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Overall good work, very well-written. I really enjoyed it. Zia Khan 23:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
- I'm busy right now, will take a look later today. Zia Khan 17:50, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Final assessment
- GA review (see Misplaced Pages:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
- Well written.
- a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
- a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
- Factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Misplaced Pages:No original research):
- a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Misplaced Pages:No original research):
- Broad in its coverage.
- a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
- a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
- Neutral .
- Fair representation, no bias:
- Fair representation, no bias:
- Stable.
- No edit wars nor disputed contents:
- No edit wars nor disputed contents:
- Illustrated appropriately by images.
- a b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Conclusion: No other issues. Good work, keep it up! Zia Khan 21:59, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- All unassessed articles
- Unassessed biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class cricket articles
- Low-importance cricket articles
- Start-Class cricket articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles
- Unassessed Journalism articles
- Unknown-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles