Revision as of 10:24, 29 January 2013 editArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits first deletion reason | Revision as of 10:25, 29 January 2013 edit undoArthur Rubin (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers130,168 edits →Unnecessary war: amplify reasonNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Unnecessary war}}) | :({{Find sources|Unnecessary war}}) | ||
There's no ''there'' there. Contains only a list of "unnecessary wars", and a list of "See also" entries, most of which would be inappropriate even if there were an article. — ] ] 10:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | There's no ''there'' there. Contains only a list of "unnecessary wars", and a list of "See also" entries, most of which would be inappropriate even if there were an article. — ] ] 10:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Let me rephrase that. Not only is there nothing of interest in the present article, I can't imagine an encylopedic article being written. Even a '''definition''' would be problematic. — ] ] 10:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:25, 29 January 2013
Unnecessary war
- Unnecessary war (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There's no there there. Contains only a list of "unnecessary wars", and a list of "See also" entries, most of which would be inappropriate even if there were an article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:24, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Let me rephrase that. Not only is there nothing of interest in the present article, I can't imagine an encylopedic article being written. Even a definition would be problematic. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:25, 29 January 2013 (UTC)