Misplaced Pages

Talk:Military camouflage: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:08, 28 January 2013 editChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers296,071 edits Archiving...← Previous edit Revision as of 13:58, 29 January 2013 edit undoGimmeBot (talk | contribs)Bots75,273 editsm Bot updating {{ArticleHistory}}Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{GA|07:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)|topic=War and military|page=1|oldid=535128229}}
|action1=GAN
|action1date=08:04, 27 January 2013
|action1link=Talk:Military camouflage/GA1
|action1result=listed
|action1oldid=535128229
|currentstatus=GA
|topic=war
}}
{{Summaryin|camouflage}} {{Summaryin|camouflage}}
{{WPMILHIST|class = GA {{WPMILHIST|class = GA

Revision as of 13:58, 29 January 2013

Good articleMilitary camouflage has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 27, 2013Good article nomineeListed
A summary of this article appears in camouflage.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Technology GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military science, technology, and theory task force
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Archives

/Archive to 2011 /Archive 2012 /Archive 2013

Categories: