Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:52, 31 January 2013

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Azerbaijan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Armenia Capture of Garadaghly is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion review on 2010 December 24. The result of the discussion was closed as moot.

Notability and POV

• "Garadaghly Massacre" - 0 hit.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Most of links that I could control are not neutral. Please find Misplaced Pages:Identifying reliable sources to prove Misplaced Pages:Notability. Takabeg (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Garadaghly Massacre also has many hits: , , , more in Russian sources , , . Since the investigation started more facts are coming out. Angel670 talk 22:47, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Cornell

Cornell states that Armenian troops conquered these villages which resulted in 99 civilian deaths, this meaning they died during the war and it doesn't say they were massacred, so using it in the header as killing of civilians and using Cornell is not accurate at all.Nocturnal781 (talk) 01:08, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

I suggest you discuss your edits here, otherwise your edits look more like a vandalism than a real edit. Cornell is a good source indicating to the number of casualities. Moreover, Cornell mentions all three villages where civilians were targeted. Meanwhile, to address your concern, I added a text from the book authored by brother of Armenian commander Monte Melkonian where the number is mentioned more than 50 civilians and details of massacre of civilians are described. Angel670 talk 03:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Azerbaijani News sources

Alot of information is cited by Azerbaijani news media, which can't be reliable, or neutral to use in this such case. Misplaced Pages aims to contain reliable information from a neutral view. Please see: WP:NEWSORG. Nocturnal781 (talk) 04:07, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

As indicated on AfD page by uninvolved editor, the Azerbaijani news media indicate to the notability of the event of the massacre, which Armenian sources do not deny either. I believe this helps. Angel670 talk 03:11, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Here is some important background information which can not be ignored when deciding to base an article mainly on (pro)-Azerbaijani news agencies.

• Freedom House: Freedom House has ranked Azerbaijans Press as "Not Free". (1)
  

• Committee to Protect Journalists: "In Azerbaijan, there are no foreign or independent broadcasters on the airwaves, and the few journalists who work on independent newspapers or websites are subject to intimidation tactics, including imprisonment on fabricated charges." (1)
  

• Reporters Without Borders: "Local media are highly polarised and the independent and opposition press are the target of continual pressure. Several highly popular foreign radio stations have been absent from Azerbaijan’s FM waveband since January 2009, including the BBC, Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty and Voice of America." Opposition newspapers are Azadlig, Khural, Monitor.(1)
  

• Institute for Reporters' Freedom and Safety (IRFS): "Azerbaijani citizens and the international community are unable to access reliable, comprehensive, and objective news on human rights issues relevant to Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan is overly reliant on government sources for information, and the population is under-informed about matters of public interest. Traditional radio and television broadcasting is under strict government control." (p.28)--Markus2685 (talk) 12:17, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Deleting content that violates wiki policies

I agree with user Grandmaster to delete all content that violates Misplaced Pages policies, thus in the first step deleting all content that is not verifiable. What remains would be a stub --Markus2685 (talk) 13:35, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Title of the artcile

As also the title of the article is disputed I suggest presenting and discussing alternative titles here. Example:

- Garadaghly incidents --Markus2685 (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I don't think a mass killing could be called just an incident. Grandmaster 18:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

"Incident" sounds really poor, Cornell used "conquered", therefore I think that something Armenian conquest of Garadaghly would be suitable. I guess Battle of Garadaghly or Siege of Garadaghly could be also technically usable.--Staberinde (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

I agree with you that it sounds poor. I am also not happy with it and I don't think it is a good alternative. It was just to start somewhere. --Markus2685 (talk) 11:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

• Keep the name - let's keep the current name, it is appropriate to the violent mass killings. Best, Konullu (talk) 23:02, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

The current name is invariably used by Azerbaijan. No foreign source has called this event a "massacre".--Markus2685 (talk) 11:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

• All unassessed articles
• Start-Class Azerbaijan articles
• Low-importance Azerbaijan articles
• WikiProject Azerbaijan articles
• Unassessed Armenian articles
• Unknown-importance Armenian articles
• WikiProject Armenia articles
• Start-Class Death articles
• Low-importance Death articles