Misplaced Pages

User talk:Neotarf: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:35, 1 February 2013 view sourceNeotarf (talk | contribs)4,029 editsm banner← Previous edit Revision as of 12:55, 2 February 2013 view source SMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,689 edits Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning: new sectionNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Retired}} {{Retired}}

== Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning ==

In case you're still watching; this is directly relevant to why you're resigning.

You'll probably want to read and weigh in on ], especially the second round, after Sandstein made it clear that he did not even know about the AN filing that led up to the AE request, and is thus missing almost all of the facts, background, context and history. The "you can now be blocked without further notice by anyone with a hare up their butt" warning we received was unfounded, unjust and invalid, and I'm not going to stand for being treated like a wikicriminal this way. I've devoted unbelievable amounts of time and effort to this project and I'll be damned if I'll be lynched for it. Note that ] indicated, before this pointless boot dropped, some willingness to resign editing over the matter as well. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' &nbsp;<span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ<sup><big>⊝</big></sup>כ<sup>⊙</sup>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 12:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:55, 2 February 2013

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.

Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning

In case you're still watching; this is directly relevant to why you're resigning.

You'll probably want to read and weigh in on User talk:SMcCandlish#Arbitration enforcement warning: Manual of Style and article titles policy, especially the second round, after Sandstein made it clear that he did not even know about the AN filing that led up to the AE request, and is thus missing almost all of the facts, background, context and history. The "you can now be blocked without further notice by anyone with a hare up their butt" warning we received was unfounded, unjust and invalid, and I'm not going to stand for being treated like a wikicriminal this way. I've devoted unbelievable amounts of time and effort to this project and I'll be damned if I'll be lynched for it. Note that User:Noetica indicated, before this pointless boot dropped, some willingness to resign editing over the matter as well. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ɖכþ Contrib. 12:55, 2 February 2013 (UTC)