Misplaced Pages

User talk:Noetica: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:05, 3 February 2013 editSMcCandlish (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors201,658 edits Leaving Misplaced Pages, as promised: Please do help resolve this.← Previous edit Revision as of 09:13, 7 February 2013 edit undoNoetica (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,370 edits Final archivingNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{retired}} {{retired}}

– except to appear at an ArbCom case, if requested
----

{{NoAutosign}}

<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
<font color="#775533;">]</font>
<p>
----

== Arbitration enforcement warning: Manual of Style and article titles policy ==

{{Ivmbox
| image = yes
| The ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the English Misplaced Pages ] and ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], satisfy any ], or follow any ]. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "]" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and&nbsp;will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.<!-- Template:uw-sanctions - {{{topic|{{{t}}}}}} -->
| valign = center
| ]
}}
This warning is made as a result of the . Please take care, in future disputes concerning the issues mentioned above, to comment on content and not on other contributors, as directed by ] and related Misplaced Pages conduct rules. Regards, <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 21:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

=== Leaving Misplaced Pages, as promised ===

'''Sandstein:'''

I will of course be leaving Misplaced Pages forever, . It is not a matter of great concern for me; I was quite ready for such an the moment I realised you had taken it on yourself to deal with such cases. O yes, I can remember!

Shortly I will be arranging an orderly departure. There are a few areas in which I want to complete some contributions. Let me just say: I ''am'' dismayed, though not surprised, at your attempting to suppress legitimate contributions supporting me, in an action brought by Apteva (who is now under a topic ban ''and'' a block). You were silent about another commenter, who had come perilously close to a block and a ban himself. He had attracted a stern warning from bureaucrat MBisanz for the battle plan he had drawn up at Apteva's talkpage, which he noisily pursued in this AE action. So note: the only reason I might stay for a little while is to assist Ohconfucius, Neotarf, and SMcCandlish in an ArbCom case, if any two of them ask me to do so. The actions, biases, and involvements (present and past) of the following admins would need scrutiny:

* KillerChihuahua
* Cailil
* SarekOfVulcan
* Sandstein

And the actions of these other editors cry out for more attention, beyond what has been done in warnings, at ], at WP:AE, and at WP:AN:

* Wikid77
* Apteva

But you see, to me it all looks like a passing Mardi Gras pageant, or a lobster quadrille. Fantastic names, costumes, and posturings&nbsp;– none of which will mean anything to me soon. So much else to do!

Best wishes,

<font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font><sup><small>]</small></sup> 08:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC) (pro tempore)

:Yes, please do stick around for resolving this issue. For now, I need evidenciary links to the evidence of the involvement you hint at with Sandstein, Cailil and SarekOfVulcan (that last of whom has generally not to me seemed to be anti-MOS or gunning for any of its regular editors, though weirdly hostile in the AE that Aptiva filed against you), as well as why you think KillerChihuahua is involved. Demonstration that Sandstein is non-neutral for historical reasons, either anti-MOS or anti-Noetica, is probably enough to put this matter to bed. (Lack of it isn't a huge issue, I don't think, but you're strongly suggesting "the admins would need scrutiny" so I'm figuring you have particular incidents in mind. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' &nbsp;<span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ<sup><big>⊝</big></sup>כ<sup>⊙</sup>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 18:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

== Sandstein's misunderstanding of the AE issues and consequent bogus warning ==

You'll probably want to read and weigh in on ], especially the second round, after Sandstein made it clear that he did not even know about the AN filing that led up to the AE request, and is thus missing almost all of the facts, background, context and history. The "you can now be blocked without further notice by anyone with a hare up their butt" warning we received was unfounded, unjust and invalid, and I'm not going to stand for being treated like a wikicriminal this way. I've devoted unbelievable amounts of time and effort to this project and I'll be damned if I'll be lynched for it. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' &nbsp;<span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ<sup><big>⊝</big></sup>כ<sup>⊙</sup>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 12:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

PS: Note that ] just resigned editing over the matter, and I think you'd indicated, before this pointless boot dropped, a willingness to do so as well. I now rescind my criticism of you for taking that position. — <font face="Trebuchet MS">''']''' &nbsp;<span style="white-space:nowrap;">] ɖ<sup><big>⊝</big></sup>כ<sup>⊙</sup>þ </span> <small>]</small></font> 12:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

:Sure! Make no mistake: I'm leaving, for good. See above. The only reason I will stay on for a while is to support any ArbCom action by you, Ohconfucius, or Neotarf. That's what it would take to overturn the warnings issued to you three, and to deal with the abuses by admins listed above.
:Just let me know what you intend. Meanwhile, I'll continue my process of disengaging gracefully from Misplaced Pages. Busy in the real world, so it might take a few days.
:<font color="blue"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font><sup><small>]</small></sup> 01:05, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

== Retired from Misplaced Pages ==

As promised above, Noetica is now retiring from Misplaced Pages.

For a little while I will keep email access open. I authorise ] to manage this talkpage, if Wavelength is interested in doing that. I would prefer that it be kept very bare. I do not want notifications of any kind here, and would prefer that they be put quickly into Archive&nbsp;7. I am not interested in responses to anything above on this talkpage. They can be archived also.

I will remain available for a short time to join any ArbCom case that is started to deal with matters arising at ]. But I have no interest in appealing against any decision made there in respect of Noetica.

Noetica no longer exists on Misplaced Pages.

Best wishes to all! ♥

<font color="red"><big>N</big><small>oetica</small></font><sup><small>]</small></sup> 11:37, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:13, 7 February 2013

Retired This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages.