| Revision as of 13:28, 22 August 2004 editHerschelkrustofsky (talk | contribs)2,877 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:28, 22 August 2004 edit undoDavid Gerard (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators213,066 edits No, they need to be here on the talk page so that the objections can be crossed off as each is resolved or invalidatedNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::: See ]. --] 13:28, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ::: See ]. --] 13:28, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC) | ||
| ::::No, they need to be here on the talk page so that the objections can be crossed off as each is resolved or invalidated - ] 23:28, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:28, 22 August 2004
- Talk:Lyndon LaRouche/The Herschelkrustofsky List of wild fabrications and propagandistic slurs in the present version.
What little of LaRouche's ideas that actually appears in this article has been "spun" so much as to be unrecognizable. Your chances of understanding LaRouche by reading this article are nil. Instead, read LaRouche for yourself: The Substance of Morality.
Weed Harper 05:04, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- The views of LaRouche activists on this article are well-known. Adam 05:19, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Unless specific, fixable objections are stated, the accuracy and NPOV warnings should be removed promptly - David Gerard 11:36, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- See Talk:Lyndon LaRouche/The Herschelkrustofsky List. --Herschelkrustofsky 13:28, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- No, they need to be here on the talk page so that the objections can be crossed off as each is resolved or invalidated - David Gerard 23:28, 22 Aug 2004 (UTC)