Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Ibrahim Yukpasi: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:29, 16 February 2013 editMezzoMezzo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,113 edits Creating deletion discussion for Ibrahim Yukpasi  Revision as of 21:07, 16 February 2013 edit undoMsoamu (talk | contribs)663 edits KeepNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources|Ibrahim Yukpasi}}) :({{Find sources|Ibrahim Yukpasi}})
The only reference for this stub is a book citing the rather non-neutral claim that a religious movement is peaceful; it does not directly relate to the subject. It's been a few years and not a single source has been brought to prove the notability of the actual subject of the article himself. I can't see any reason to keep this article here. ] (]) 13:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC) The only reference for this stub is a book citing the rather non-neutral claim that a religious movement is peaceful; it does not directly relate to the subject. It's been a few years and not a single source has been brought to prove the notability of the actual subject of the article himself. I can't see any reason to keep this article here. ] (]) 13:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
::Some one had removed reliable info,which i restored.Must be kept.] (]) 21:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:07, 16 February 2013

Ibrahim Yukpasi

Ibrahim Yukpasi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only reference for this stub is a book citing the rather non-neutral claim that a religious movement is peaceful; it does not directly relate to the subject. It's been a few years and not a single source has been brought to prove the notability of the actual subject of the article himself. I can't see any reason to keep this article here. MezzoMezzo (talk) 13:29, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Some one had removed reliable info,which i restored.Must be kept.Msoamu (talk) 21:07, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Categories: