| Revision as of 19:43, 18 February 2013 editToohool (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,716 edits →Carmen Media: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:48, 18 February 2013 edit undoDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits →Carmen MediaNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ::The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? ] (]) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :::The nomination is in bad faith. You know very well that 2005 is not "the subject or their associates", seeing as you've made the same ad hominem attack against him regarding the ]. ] (]) 19:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | :::The nomination is in bad faith. You know very well that 2005 is not "the subject or their associates", seeing as you've made the same ad hominem attack against him regarding the ]. ] (]) 19:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::I wasn't aware who created this article, I just assumed only the subject or somebody paid by the subject would be motivated to create a spam article promoting a business. ] (]) 19:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete'''. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer ], nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - ] - ] 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer ], nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - ] - ] 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:48, 18 February 2013
Carmen Media
- Carmen Media (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, no sources, likely created by the subject or their associates. DegenFarang (talk) 23:35, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I found a news reference at www.online-casinos.com/news/news2200.asp but that site appears to be blacklisted. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Some court cases involving this company and internet gambling are cited in this Google Books search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:40, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 February 18. Snotbot t • c » 00:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep Nom has AFD'd a batch of articles created by User:2005 as part of what appears to be an ongoing feud between these two editors. Such a waste of the community's time should not be condoned. Toohool (talk) 07:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? DegenFarang (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The nomination is in bad faith. You know very well that 2005 is not "the subject or their associates", seeing as you've made the same ad hominem attack against him regarding the American Gaming Association. Toohool (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware who created this article, I just assumed only the subject or somebody paid by the subject would be motivated to create a spam article promoting a business. DegenFarang (talk) 19:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The nomination is in bad faith. You know very well that 2005 is not "the subject or their associates", seeing as you've made the same ad hominem attack against him regarding the American Gaming Association. Toohool (talk) 19:43, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- The ad hominem attack is not appropriate or appreciated. Please discuss content and not people. Do you have a specific objection to this article being deleted? DegenFarang (talk) 13:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unreferenced article about a commercial business. My understanding is that litigation reports generally are not enough to confer notability on a business, nor is trade coverage on a website about online casinos. The current article text is advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:04, 18 February 2013 (UTC)