User talk:SlimVirgin/History 2: Difference between revisions

< User talk:SlimVirgin Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 22:38, 18 May 2006 editKim Bruning (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,995 edits →A good query, but...: :-(← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:59, 18 May 2006 edit undoGrace Note (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users4,516 edits My userpageNext edit →
Line 103:		Line 103:
	:Brave girl. Somebody had to do it. Based on project demographics, I don't see it succeeding, but it's worth discussing. Many good ideas will never be implimented here, but such is the system we are in. Keep up the good work :). - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)		:Brave girl. Somebody had to do it. Based on project demographics, I don't see it succeeding, but it's worth discussing. Many good ideas will never be implimented here, but such is the system we are in. Keep up the good work :). - ] <sup><small>]</small></sup> 22:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
	:: No, this is definately not the way I'd ever want to see wikipedia to go. This is a terrible plan. No matter that people are messing up the project space, I still don't want to limit the work of good people who are there as well. Don't take the wiki out of wikipedia, please. ] 22:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)		:: No, this is definately not the way I'd ever want to see wikipedia to go. This is a terrible plan. No matter that people are messing up the project space, I still don't want to limit the work of good people who are there as well. Don't take the wiki out of wikipedia, please. ] 22:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

			== My userpage ==

			Please do me a favour and unprotect it. SeanBlack is pretending not to know the difference between harmless fun and personal attacks and has protected it to try to upset me. As you know, he has a personal problem with me. I know you don't like to undo other admins' actions but I am asking you to do it as a personal favour because I doubt he will want to wheelwar a respected member of the community. Feel free to admonish Sean at the same time. He's way too fond of bullying other editors and needs to grow up, learn this is not the schoolyard and learn to behave properly around adults.] 23:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:59, 18 May 2006

Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. — Jimbo Wales

File:PoodleM1.jpg

Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper.— Robert Frost

And in case you're here with a personal attack: Any time something is written against me, I not only share the sentiment but feel I could do the job far better myself.— Jorge Luis Borges

Please leave comments about articles on article talk pages. Any such comments left here may be moved or deleted. Many thanks.

Archives

1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28
29 30

In a minute there is time For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse. T.S. Eliot, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

settlement/neighbourhood clarification

Hi SlimVirgin, I saw your rv on Pisgat Ze'ev and I'd like to know what consenus, if any, would allow me to maintain that position with respect to the other neighbourhoods constructed in the parts of Jerusalem captured by Israel in 1967 and annexed in 1980. Since I raised the issue on Talk:Har Homa, I was met with the result of finding the other prominent neighborhoods (i.e. Gilo (neighborhood) and French Hill) being labeled settlements. Cheers, Tewfik 00:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

3-RR

Is it a revert if you insert text to an article in such a way that it changes the meaning of a sentence? For example, if the sentence is:

"Jesus is God"

and someone writes:

"Jesus is not God"

and this has never been said before, have they made a revert anyway, because it "undoes" the work of another editor? - Drogo Underburrow 01:05, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Following your comments on Talk:Hamas regarding balance in article intro's and the relative level of attention they should give to current events, you might be interested in taking a quick glance at this article. I have made some comments on the talk page, for what it's worth. Palmiro | Talk 12:54, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Update on RichardMalter and Bi-Digital O-Ring Test

As I just noted on WP:AN/3RR, RichardMalter has now reverted your reversion of Bi-Digital O-Ring Test, and responded to your warning on his talk page. --Philosophus 16:21, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Incorrect

Please see user's very non NPOV edits above (Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Special:Contributions.2FIncorrect). Arniep 16:46, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

In case you missed it

may be of interest. —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

A good query, but...

Misplaced Pages:Editing policy pages is going to be mess of people adding options. Try "yes, in general, plus suggestion" and "no, in general" first. Then take the few most cited suggestions and have a run-off. (I'd say). Marskell 19:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I inserted two headlines to emphasize the either/or. You know, six months(!) will actually exclude numerous admins... Marskell 19:41, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I don't see the need Slim of choosing many options. That would make things confusing. Cheers -- Szvest 19:53, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Brave girl. Somebody had to do it. Based on project demographics, I don't see it succeeding, but it's worth discussing. Many good ideas will never be implimented here, but such is the system we are in. Keep up the good work :). - Taxman 22:20, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

No, this is definately not the way I'd ever want to see wikipedia to go. This is a terrible plan. No matter that people are messing up the project space, I still don't want to limit the work of good people who are there as well. Don't take the wiki out of wikipedia, please. Kim Bruning 22:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

My userpage

Please do me a favour and unprotect it. SeanBlack is pretending not to know the difference between harmless fun and personal attacks and has protected it to try to upset me. As you know, he has a personal problem with me. I know you don't like to undo other admins' actions but I am asking you to do it as a personal favour because I doubt he will want to wheelwar a respected member of the community. Feel free to admonish Sean at the same time. He's way too fond of bullying other editors and needs to grow up, learn this is not the schoolyard and learn to behave properly around adults.Grace Note 23:59, 18 May 2006 (UTC)