Revision as of 23:26, 21 February 2013 editYunshui (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers69,412 edits Reverted to revision 539551317 by DegenFarang: you may not remove active block notices and unblock requests whilst the block is in force.. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:33, 21 February 2013 edit undoDegenFarang (talk | contribs)2,116 edits Undid revision 539552812 by Yunshui (talk) suck my dickNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
== Block reinstated == |
|
|
|
|
|
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for harassing other users and violating your unblock conditions . If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding below this notice the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. — <strong><tt>]</tt></strong> 01:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-blockindef --> |
|
|
|
|
|
{{unblock reviewed|reason=As discussed at the ANI, an interaction ban accomplishes the same thing. 99% of my problems on Misplaced Pages and nearly all of my blocks are from interacting with one other editor. If we were banned from interacting, this problem would go away, and Misplaced Pages would retain a valuable editor.|decline=I have spent some long time reading through the ANI thread and your and ]'s edits. Having done so I do not believe that you will, if unblocked, be a net positive influence here.--<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 21:06, 21 February 2013 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
While we wait for your unblock request to be reviewed, I don't suppose you could explain (mainly for the unblocking admin's benefit) for the rationale of ? ] ] ] 20:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:I was blanking the page ] (]) 21:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Seeking second opinion. You can read my reason for requesting the unblock above. | decline=Procedural. Anthony's decline above ''is'' a second opinion. You don't get to shop around until you find an admin who'll give you the response you want. Either file a better unblock request, or expect to lose your talkpage access. ] ]‍] 22:35, 21 February 2013 (UTC)}} |
|
|
|
|
|
*I will leave this for another admin to review, but I don't feel like we can take you at your word. It was nearly a year ago that you said Clearly, that was not the case. You have already had your second chance, your third chance... and so on. You want a ''ninth'' chance to prove you can exercise some self control? Do you really think it is realistic to expect that? I would suggest you consider the ] only maybe make it more like a year instead of six months. Maybe in that length of time you will learn to let go of this grudge and participate here in a way that is beneficial rather than disruptive. ] (]) 21:41, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::I don't need any chances with an interaction ban. As soon as I violated it he would report me. I guess a year is not a long time in WikiTime but I think I did show a lot of self control. It took a year to get here again lol ] (]) 22:50, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
:::One way interaction bans are rarely if ever workable, and constraining another editor to avoid you would be placing an unfair restriction on their editing because of ''your'' behaviour. As such, an indefinite block (and, given , I think we can take out the "de") is the most equitable solution for Misplaced Pages. ] ]‍] 22:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|
|
::::It's not just my behavior, he's just much better at wikilawyering and I'm very bad at it. If I was as well versed in digging up old stuff and citing various policies, he would have been blocked a long time ago. ] (]) 23:19, 21 February 2013 (UTC) |
|