Revision as of 18:36, 19 May 2006 editDr. R.K.Z (talk | contribs)3,098 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:19, 20 May 2006 edit undoOsFan (talk | contribs)1,179 edits RV previously deleted commentNext edit → | ||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
-I understand, thankyou for clarifying. | -I understand, thankyou for clarifying. | ||
=To Osfan= | |||
I have the right to delete snide snobbish lip I'm getting from mistakes I can't help because of physical problems. Why don't you try and learn to be a professional when saying what was "attrocious" about an edit I made? I could'nt give a rat's ass if you find fault in it, as it can be easily fixed by somebody else. Besides, as stated in the first edit made, it was done quickly and was'nt a "permanent edit", meaning I had no intention of caring if it was well maintained in format or whatnot. If I somehow offended you SOOO badly that you decided to give me lip over it, your funeral. A viking funeral. | |||
Until I get a warning from people above you, don't expect your comments to stay that long | |||
:My issue with ] was the poor spelling. If you don't have the time to do basic things such as spell check, then leave the article for someone else to creat. You can recommend Misplaced Pages articles to get created as well at ]. I also was not personally attacking you; I was attacking your work. ] 15:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
== Personal attacks == | == Personal attacks == | ||
Line 69: | Line 76: | ||
Looks like you clearly don't know how to read, look above toots, I said I have problems that lead to my occasional mistakes in the typo department, not only did you decide to blatantly ''disrespect'' this problem and use it to justify your inane and stupid crusade against what I did to some fracking article I did'nt give a damn about, you've, again, ignored the explanation I gave for it. | Looks like you clearly don't know how to read, look above toots, I said I have problems that lead to my occasional mistakes in the typo department, not only did you decide to blatantly ''disrespect'' this problem and use it to justify your inane and stupid crusade against what I did to some fracking article I did'nt give a damn about, you've, again, ignored the explanation I gave for it. | ||
Why the pluck is this article so essential to you? I've done plenty of articles since then that are perfectly well spelt given time and paitence. You clearly want attention, and you're clearly getting none of it. Again, I never had any intention of doing anything with that article other than putting it up there in a hurry for others tp quickly clean up and reedit, meaning I did'nt care |
Why the pluck is this article so essential to you? I've done plenty of articles since then that are perfectly well spelt given time and paitence. You clearly want attention, and you're clearly getting none of it. Again, I never had any intention of doing anything with that article other than putting it up there in a hurry for others tp quickly clean up and reedit, meaning I did'nt care it was rushed or mispelt, aritcles that I DO care about get more professional attention, So take that to the bank, roll it up, and cheque it, I'm done with you. | ||
(After another generic bout of whining) | (After another generic bout of whining) | ||
Line 82: | Line 89: | ||
And I'll report ''you'' for disguising or deleting factual accounts. JR at 'Mania never ONCE said Cena was too original and edgy for traditionalists to understand, I'm a traditionalist, I "get" Cena, I get Rap, I get hip hop, what you kept in there makes it sound as if the traditionalists don't have a fracking clue, but if JR never implied that Cena was too much for our kind, then it should'nt be in there. | And I'll report ''you'' for disguising or deleting factual accounts. JR at 'Mania never ONCE said Cena was too original and edgy for traditionalists to understand, I'm a traditionalist, I "get" Cena, I get Rap, I get hip hop, what you kept in there makes it sound as if the traditionalists don't have a fracking clue, but if JR never implied that Cena was too much for our kind, then it should'nt be in there. | ||
==Funny== | |||
As usual you continue to manipulate your talk page to your liking. ] 18:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:19, 20 May 2006
Welcome, from Journalist
Rules: If requested to leave after a dispute reaches no satisfying conclusion, leave the talkback, and this user, alone. Attempts to disobey borders on Harrasment and I WILL report you.
Welcome!
Hello, Dr. R.K.Z/Old, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
- Since others have mistook me for a program or bot of some kind, Ill just like to start putting it out there that Im 100% real :)
Toon Zone
Hi, the edits to Toon Zone have incorrectly pasted the Misplaced Pages donation message at the top. If you want to make edits to the article, please make sure the edits contain only relevant info. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 14:42, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Sofa_artigo_metalder_05_pq.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Sofa_artigo_metalder_05_pq.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Misplaced Pages because of copyright law (see Misplaced Pages's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Misplaced Pages is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Misplaced Pages talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 20:22, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Year_2.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Year_2.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Misplaced Pages because of copyright law (see Misplaced Pages's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Misplaced Pages are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Misplaced Pages:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Misplaced Pages talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
TVRage
I moved the following here from Talk:TVRage.com. Mangojuice 20:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
Who the hell took this down? TV.COM purist vandals? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. R.K.Z (talk • contribs)
- Doubtful --- only admins can actually delete pages. I just checked for you and record of it is available at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/TVRage.com (second nomination). According to it, the determination was delete. So from what I can tell, no vandalism, just a considered decision. Agent0042 20:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC)
There seems to a large amount of "keeps" in the ATD, so this could not have been a consensus decision from the TV.COM loyalists, but mainly because of the rules the article was breaking, which was easily repairable given one neutral partys' intervention.
I suppose I can try and reestablish it later once I figure out how to approach it objectivly. Dr. R.K.Z
- Hey, I'm for it, actually, if you can get it to work. But I worry that somebody may delete it again, saying that it's still not noteable enough. Another page for a site called "TeleGuides" was also taken down. Agent0042 02:36, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Blanking pages
Please do not replace Misplaced Pages pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ⇒ SWATJester Aim Fire! 19:56, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
If it's about the TZ article, it's to clear up the clustured discussion.
Unfortunately, it's generally not considered good form to remove other people's talk page comments. If you think the page is large enough for an archive, you can archive it, otherwise, you should leave other people's talk page comments alone. ⇒ SWATJester Aim Fire! 20:06, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
-I understand, thankyou for clarifying.
To Osfan
I have the right to delete snide snobbish lip I'm getting from mistakes I can't help because of physical problems. Why don't you try and learn to be a professional when saying what was "attrocious" about an edit I made? I could'nt give a rat's ass if you find fault in it, as it can be easily fixed by somebody else. Besides, as stated in the first edit made, it was done quickly and was'nt a "permanent edit", meaning I had no intention of caring if it was well maintained in format or whatnot. If I somehow offended you SOOO badly that you decided to give me lip over it, your funeral. A viking funeral.
Until I get a warning from people above you, don't expect your comments to stay that long
- My issue with Hugo Savinovich was the poor spelling. If you don't have the time to do basic things such as spell check, then leave the article for someone else to creat. You can recommend Misplaced Pages articles to get created as well at Misplaced Pages: Requested articles/sports. I also was not personally attacking you; I was attacking your work. OsFan 15:22, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Like this are not welcomed on Misplaced Pages. Please refrain from making similar comments in the future. No personal attacks is an offical policy on Misplaced Pages. Comment on content, not on the contributor. Personal attacks will rarely help you make a point; they hurt the Misplaced Pages community and deter users from helping create a good encyclopedia. --Naha| 17:50, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
- I merely said the spelling was atrocious. Is that really a big deal? What terminology should I use? OsFan 03:34, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- The comment "please learn to spell" was'nt needed. I have problems that lead to my occasional mistakes in the typo department and you struck a personal chord
- Blah Blah Blah:::
- The comment "please learn to spell" was'nt needed. I have problems that lead to my occasional mistakes in the typo department and you struck a personal chord
Looks like you clearly don't know how to read, look above toots, I said I have problems that lead to my occasional mistakes in the typo department, not only did you decide to blatantly disrespect this problem and use it to justify your inane and stupid crusade against what I did to some fracking article I did'nt give a damn about, you've, again, ignored the explanation I gave for it.
Why the pluck is this article so essential to you? I've done plenty of articles since then that are perfectly well spelt given time and paitence. You clearly want attention, and you're clearly getting none of it. Again, I never had any intention of doing anything with that article other than putting it up there in a hurry for others tp quickly clean up and reedit, meaning I did'nt care it was rushed or mispelt, aritcles that I DO care about get more professional attention, So take that to the bank, roll it up, and cheque it, I'm done with you.
(After another generic bout of whining)
Learn to READ. I swear to god, how long does it take you to understand when your opinion and your voice is'nt wanted here? Delete the comments I've left on YOUR talback and let's be done with this (and I note I only ever commented on your talkback again because you decided to completly ignore everything I've said above in previous exchanges to again post here when told not to) I'm going to report you the next time you even think of attacking this page again. This is your final warning
John Cena
Don't call editors such as myself or Antrophica (who are both male) "fangirls" while editing John Cena. I consider it a personal attack, and I will report you if you persist. Blacklist 02:44, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
And I'll report you for disguising or deleting factual accounts. JR at 'Mania never ONCE said Cena was too original and edgy for traditionalists to understand, I'm a traditionalist, I "get" Cena, I get Rap, I get hip hop, what you kept in there makes it sound as if the traditionalists don't have a fracking clue, but if JR never implied that Cena was too much for our kind, then it should'nt be in there.
Funny
As usual you continue to manipulate your talk page to your liking. OsFan 18:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)