| Revision as of 20:32, 5 April 2006 editCantara (talk | contribs)540 edits →possible copyvio← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:17, 20 May 2006 edit undoSupine (talk | contribs)727 edits not exactly npov.Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. ''some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found .'' Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! ] 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. ''some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found .'' Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! ] 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| ==not exactly npov== | |||
| what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -] 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:17, 20 May 2006
possible copyvio
A lot of the text seems to be taken directly from the band's history page on their website. I think that the page can be edited so as to be okay, but I checked out the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Copyright problems which say that you should blank the page and put up a copyvio notice...? Not sure what to do here - I'm going to wait a day or so and see if anyone has any ideas. Cantara 19:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
What's your concern? The text was ok'd by the band to be presented here on Misplaced Pages.
Okay then. I wasn't aware of that. Perhaps mention of this should be made somewhere on the page, e.g. some text courtesy of LAM, can also be found . Also, would you mind signing your messages? It's a little annoying to have to look at the history to see who left me a note. Thanks! Cantara 20:32, 5 April 2006 (UTC)
not exactly npov
what are adjectives like "funny" and "touching" doing in what's supposed to be an encyclopedic article? this reads like a fan's praise rather than a fact-based, informative article. -supine 07:17, 20 May 2006 (UTC)