| Revision as of 14:10, 7 March 2013 editTransporterMan (talk | contribs)Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, Mass message senders, Pending changes reviewers23,033 edits →Ayo thar1: tks← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:22, 8 March 2013 edit undoTishapocks (talk | contribs)4 edits →Misguided: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 211: | Line 211: | ||
| :Thank you very much. Best regards, ] (]) 14:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | :Thank you very much. Best regards, ] (]) 14:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Misguided == | |||
| The users are having their edits stalked. Using a new account to avoid that stalking is appropriate. Unsigned edits won't prevent the edit stalking which you've facilitated by posting to AN.--] (]) 20:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:22, 8 March 2013
|
This will ensure that conversations remain together! |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present. |
Thanks!
N5iln has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!
oldcsd
Re: GoodSearch opinion
Thank you for the information. Understand the comments and agree with the suggestion. Uptodateinfo
{{Hangon}} for Course Selection at Earl Haig Secondary School
I have once again put the {{Hangon}} Template on the article, but I'm quite unsure why this article would be moved to deletion. It doesn't seem to have vandalized the copyrighted content, and also doesn't seem to have plagiarized someone's work. I can see what you are talking about, but I think that this article shouldn't be deleted. Otherwise, I will improve this article to Misplaced Pages's standard. But thanks for your notice.
Please contact me if you have any concerns.
Besides I'm only a Wikipedian for less than 6 months so I'm quite inexperienced. However the quality and standard of my articles will improve. Challisrussia (talk)
Village with offensive name
Just looked at your referral for Kotak, a village with an allegedly offensive name. The offensive word would be kotok (which is offensive slang for penis in at least Kyrgyz. However, Kotak should be ok -- it also appears on google maps for roughly the same location shown in the article -- Google Map of Kotak. Thanks for checking up on it, though! ~~
Wikiquette Alerts Notice Response
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Re:
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
¡Thanks For The Heads-Up!
Binkernet would no doubt have been more than happy for me to have been unaware of the changes in that page; Thank you for the heads up. A REDDSON
Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Legal_threat_by_User:Uboater_at_Talk:U-8047_Replica_Submarine.23Connection_with_trust
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Merit for 3O
Hi. I hope I am not bothering you but a user is asking me about the merit of a 3O in a specific case. I wonder if you could take a quick look here: User talk:Codename Lisa#Third Opinion. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:58, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
How to proceed in this case
Hello, TransporterMan
There is an edit dispute that I do not know how to act about. So, I thought I'd better consult you before proceeding. (Or shall I say before making a fool out of myself, being shot down and being called a liar!) Here is the case: A few days ago, I added Windows 1.0 logo to Windows 1.0 article, only to see it reverted in spite of the fact that I have cited Microsoft confirming that it is their logo. Now, you don't see much discussion in the article talk page because the discussion is located on the image talk page ... which is on Wikimedia Commons. The discussion is very heated and desperately in need of mediation.
Which venue for dispute resolution do you suggest?
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
- I believe that there's enough discussion at Talk:Windows 1.0#Iffy logo and User talk:Dmcq#Windows 1.0 logo removal request to take it to DRN without referencing anything at Commons, but it appears to me that the discussion at commons:File talk:Windows logo and watermark - 1985.svg#Origins of the logo subsequent to you posting your question here has now agreed that the logo is genuine and I doubt that there will be any further dispute. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:55, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
About who should I invite
Hello, TransporterMan
I was hoping to get an advice from you about who I should invite to a DRN discussion.
There is an issue with license agreement of Microsoft Office 2013, already discussed twice in Talk:Microsoft Office 2013 § Retail editions locked to the first PC they are installed on and Talk:Microsoft Office 2013 § The "Locked to One Machine Forever" restriction is critical and needs to be mentioned in the lede. But a recent revert from User:Dogmaticeclectic has made it clear-cut that we need more discussion. Now, when I open the discussion, who should I invite? For example, should I invite User:Sonicdrewdriver just because he made one comment in the second discussion? Or User:Barpoint? He seems content with the current state but am I right?
Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 10:58, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
- Invite everyone who might dispute whatever is worked out at DRN, otherwise any solution worked out at DRN may not "stick." Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:08, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
DRN talk page - personal attack
"This would be helpful with the likely upcoming WP:ANI discussion about Ryan's tendentious editing. Zad68" I have removed it as a personal attack by threatening. However the original editor has restored it. I also think even if there is a doubt as if its a personal attack per content, being placed on the DRN talk it looks like a personal attack even more. It just came out of nowhere, irrelevant to the current DRN discussion. Thank you. Ryanspir (talk) 16:16, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a Methodist...
Based on --Orlady (talk) 18:50, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
- And this. Have taken it to the talk page. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:58, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
Ayo thar1
 |
Hello TransporterMan, Eduemoni has given you a shinning smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shinning Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! |
- Thank you very much. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:10, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Misguided
The users are having their edits stalked. Using a new account to avoid that stalking is appropriate. Unsigned edits won't prevent the edit stalking which you've facilitated by posting to AN.--Tishapocks (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2013 (UTC)