| Revision as of 21:32, 9 March 2013 editHistoryofIran (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers97,230 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:45, 9 March 2013 edit undoIselilja (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,359 edits comment.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Sorry, that was a typo; I meant "you'll need to address that in your '''un'''block request." --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 21:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | :Sorry, that was a typo; I meant "you'll need to address that in your '''un'''block request." --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 21:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Sorry, but what do you mean? haven't i already done that? can you show a link or help me? | Sorry, but what do you mean? haven't i already done that? can you show a link or help me? | ||
| :History of Iran: I think you should read the rules about ], and in particular note that you are not allowed to edit war (revert back and forth), ''even if you think you are right''. I think you have to show the administrators that you understand this rule, and will abide with it. Once an edit conflict is established, it should be solved at the talk page. Regarding the conflict; it appears to me that this may be a conflict between popular history and more scholarly history, where your sources are seen as not to be scholarly enough. You may argue about this on the talk page, but please also take into consideration what the other part is saying. I think you should take a little time to consider some of the rules here in more details and then come back again. Regards, ] (]) 21:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:45, 9 March 2013
March 2013
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 17:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
HistoryofIran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why the hell i am blocked? what have i done? i have only added sources and improved a wikipedia page with a picture and many more things? maybe you should read the Surena page.. HistoryofIran (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
For my reasoning, see my post below that you have already deleted. See also the full 3RR report: Misplaced Pages:AN3#User:HistoryofIran reported by Fut.Perf. (Result: Blocked for 72 hours). The 3RR report included a diff from a different article in which you changed a word that was included in several direct quotes, thus falsifying the references. I guess that you don't care about references, since you already know that you are correct about everything. Perhaps you should be working on your own personal web site instead of Misplaced Pages. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:19, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
HistoryofIran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Alright, i am sorry if i was a little rude, but i have just found something out, i have even found out more sources that works for the rules you showed me, these are extra sources that show that this is the statue of Surena, and here are the three extra sources http://tonbak.wordpress.com/2011/07/04/surena-the-ancient-persian-general/ http://www.iran-daily.com/1391/4/8/MainPaper/4267/Page/6/Index.htm http://books.google.dk/books?id=p7kltwf9yrwC&pg=PA136&lpg=PA136&dq=general+surena&source=bl&ots=1CGspHhxcB&sig=eV5nFa2TIvgC0vpl88lkxLyRni4&hl=en&sa=X&ei=7aA7UbmgE5GLswb7uYGYCg&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBTgK#v=onepage&q=general%20surena&f=false HistoryofIran (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring; you'll need to address that in your block request. --jpgordon 21:13, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
What do you mean? can you please show a link to the block request? ain't i already doing that?
- Sorry, that was a typo; I meant "you'll need to address that in your unblock request." --jpgordon 21:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Sorry, but what do you mean? haven't i already done that? can you show a link or help me?
- History of Iran: I think you should read the rules about edit warring, and in particular note that you are not allowed to edit war (revert back and forth), even if you think you are right. I think you have to show the administrators that you understand this rule, and will abide with it. Once an edit conflict is established, it should be solved at the talk page. Regarding the conflict; it appears to me that this may be a conflict between popular history and more scholarly history, where your sources are seen as not to be scholarly enough. You may argue about this on the talk page, but please also take into consideration what the other part is saying. I think you should take a little time to consider some of the rules here in more details and then come back again. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 21:45, 9 March 2013 (UTC)