| Revision as of 17:15, 25 August 2004 editBcorr (talk | contribs)Administrators10,092 editsm collaborated -> met← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:26, 25 August 2004 edit undoHerschelkrustofsky (talk | contribs)2,877 edits why not tell the whole truth?Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| Berlet began his activism as a member of ], the ] ] group, and was later involved in the ], which was later exposed as a ] front, and is part of the reason he became interested in the semi-] activities of right-wing organizations. He has published articles in publications ranging from ] to '']''. | Berlet began his activism as a member of ], the ] ] group, and was later involved in the ], which was later exposed as a ] front, and is part of the reason he became interested in the semi-] activities of right-wing organizations. He has published articles in publications ranging from ] to '']''. | ||
| Berlet made much of his reputation by researching ]. Berlet and ] co-wrote an report on LaRouche in 1981 for ''High Times'' magazine, entitled "They Want to Take Your Drugs Away," which discussed the issue as part of what was described as LaRouche's right-wing agenda. This article caught the attention of LaRouche's opponents, who convened a sort of "council of war" to check his growing activity. Eyewitness reports and court testimony have established that a series of meetings were held in ] at the Manhattan home of investment banker ], with the participation of King and Berlet, along with the following: ], of the ]; ], then a consultant to the National Security Council and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (]); Mira Lansky Boland, head of Fact Finding at the Washington, D.C. offices of the ]; at least one representative of ], a private research organization headed by ] Chairman ]; ], a wealthy Pittsburgh businessman, whose tax-exempt foundation would later come under federal criminal investigation for illegally financing the arming of the Nicaraguan Contras (Mellon-Scaife later became notorious for his involvement in the ] case, and other activities intended to discredit President ]); and several dozen journalists from major national media outlets, including ], '']'', '']'', '']'' and '']''. Out of these meetings came a wave of articles describing LaRouche variously as a ], ], ], ], ] leader, and ] Stories circulated that LaRouche had orchestrated the assassination of ] Prime Minister ], and that he had attempted to assassinate U.S. President ]. Similar articles began to appear, as well, in the Western European and ] press. These articles were coupled with calls for the investigation of LaRouche's fundraising, to see whether he was obtaining funding through illegal means. ] magazine asked, "Why isn't the Internal Revenue Service interested" in prosecuting LaRouche? Berlet and King played a prominent role in this campaign. | |||
| Berlet made much of his reputation by researching ]. Berlet and ], co-wrote an report on LaRouche in 1981 for ''High Times'' magazine, entitled "They Want to Take Your Drugs Away," which discussed the issue as part of what was described as LaRouche's right-wing agenda. As part of their later research, Berlet and King met with the ]'s ] and right-wing billionaire ]. | |||
| During the ] Presidential campaign in the United States, Berlet issued a report entitled "Clouds Blur the Rainbow" about the ], which placed ] on the ballot in all 50 states as a ], ] Presidential candidate that year. The report demonstrated that in ], ] (the psychotherapist who later founded the New Alliance Party) had entered into a alliance with Lyndon LaRouche, which lasted less than a year, but heavily influenced the tactics and strategies of the New Alliance Party. Critics, including Berlet and previous New Alliance Party presidential candidate ], proved that the New Alliance Party was in fact a psychotherapy ] that was more a vehicle for Fred Newman's ] movement than it was a left-wing third political party, and which continued to incorporate some of LaRouche's ideas. | During the ] Presidential campaign in the United States, Berlet issued a report entitled "Clouds Blur the Rainbow" about the ], which placed ] on the ballot in all 50 states as a ], ] Presidential candidate that year. The report demonstrated that in ], ] (the psychotherapist who later founded the New Alliance Party) had entered into a alliance with Lyndon LaRouche, which lasted less than a year, but heavily influenced the tactics and strategies of the New Alliance Party. Critics, including Berlet and previous New Alliance Party presidential candidate ], proved that the New Alliance Party was in fact a psychotherapy ] that was more a vehicle for Fred Newman's ] movement than it was a left-wing third political party, and which continued to incorporate some of LaRouche's ideas. | ||
Revision as of 21:26, 25 August 2004
John Foster "Chip" Berlet is a researcher at Political Research Associates — which concentrates on researching the political right — and specializes in tracking and analyzing right-wing movements.
Berlet began his activism as a member of Students for a Democratic Society, the 1960s New Left group, and was later involved in the National Student Association, which was later exposed as a CIA front, and is part of the reason he became interested in the semi-covert activities of right-wing organizations. He has published articles in publications ranging from Radical America to High Times.
Berlet made much of his reputation by researching Lyndon LaRouche. Berlet and Dennis King co-wrote an report on LaRouche in 1981 for High Times magazine, entitled "They Want to Take Your Drugs Away," which discussed the issue as part of what was described as LaRouche's right-wing agenda. This article caught the attention of LaRouche's opponents, who convened a sort of "council of war" to check his growing activity. Eyewitness reports and court testimony have established that a series of meetings were held in 1983 at the Manhattan home of investment banker John Train, with the participation of King and Berlet, along with the following: John Rees, of the John Birch Society; Roy Godson, then a consultant to the National Security Council and the President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (PFIAB); Mira Lansky Boland, head of Fact Finding at the Washington, D.C. offices of the Anti- Defamation League of B'nai B'rith; at least one representative of Freedom House, a private research organization headed by PFIAB Chairman Leo Cherne; Richard Mellon-Scaife, a wealthy Pittsburgh businessman, whose tax-exempt foundation would later come under federal criminal investigation for illegally financing the arming of the Nicaraguan Contras (Mellon-Scaife later became notorious for his involvement in the Paula Jones case, and other activities intended to discredit President Bill Clinton); and several dozen journalists from major national media outlets, including NBC-TV, Readers Digest, Business Week, The New Republic and The Wall Street Journal. Out of these meetings came a wave of articles describing LaRouche variously as a fascist, communist, racist, anti-Semite, cult leader, and conspiracy theorist. Stories circulated that LaRouche had orchestrated the assassination of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme, and that he had attempted to assassinate U.S. President Jimmy Carter. Similar articles began to appear, as well, in the Western European and Soviet press. These articles were coupled with calls for the investigation of LaRouche's fundraising, to see whether he was obtaining funding through illegal means. Sovetskaya Kultura magazine asked, "Why isn't the Internal Revenue Service interested" in prosecuting LaRouche? Berlet and King played a prominent role in this campaign.
During the 1988 Presidential campaign in the United States, Berlet issued a report entitled "Clouds Blur the Rainbow" about the New Alliance Party, which placed Lenora Fulani on the ballot in all 50 states as a third party, left-wing Presidential candidate that year. The report demonstrated that in 1974, Fred Newman (the psychotherapist who later founded the New Alliance Party) had entered into a alliance with Lyndon LaRouche, which lasted less than a year, but heavily influenced the tactics and strategies of the New Alliance Party. Critics, including Berlet and previous New Alliance Party presidential candidate Dennis Serrette, proved that the New Alliance Party was in fact a psychotherapy cult that was more a vehicle for Fred Newman's Social Therapy movement than it was a left-wing third political party, and which continued to incorporate some of LaRouche's ideas.
In addition to his research into Lyndon LaRouche and Fred Newman, Berlet gained a reputation during the 1980s as a researcher into government abuses of civil liberties, and as a critic of intelligence agencies and the FBI. Articles of his appeared in publications such as Covert Action Quarterly, and he issued lists of recommended books on government abuses which included books by Victor Marchetti and L. Fletcher Prouty. During the 1991 Gulf War Berlet worked to expose other left-wing critics of intelligence agencies as wittingly or unwittingly being channels for conspiracy theories of the extreme right. In articles which appeared in magazines including The Progressive and In These Times, Berlet criticized the Christic Institute, Craig Hulet, Victor Marchetti, L. Fletcher Prouty, Mark Lane, the Oliver Stone film JFK, and the October Surprise theory. He published a report entitled "Right Woos Left" in 1992 about many of the above theories and how he saw their origins within a populism of the extreme right wing, and not being genuinely progressive or leftist. Berlet has been critical at times of Ralph Nader, Alexander Cockburn, and Ramsey Clark, who are willing to work with populists of the right on common issues of concern, such as anti-globalization and peace activism.