Misplaced Pages

:Requests for mediation: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:05, 23 May 2006 editEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits →Sonic the Hedgehog etc: Delisted← Previous edit Revision as of 01:06, 23 May 2006 edit undoEssjay (talk | contribs)21,413 edits →[]: Remove notice after a weekNext edit →
Line 229: Line 229:
::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ::''For the Mediation Committee,''



==]==
{{/Incorrect format|05:54, May 16, 2006}}


== Neo-Tech == == Neo-Tech ==

Revision as of 01:06, 23 May 2006


Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Rfm-header

Instructions

New requests should be listed at the top of the "New Requests" section, right below the template sample. All requests must use the template provided below.

All parties to the mediation must indicate agreement to mediate by signing the "Parties' agreement to mediate" section; any request that has not been signed by all parties within 7 days will be rejected. Please watch this page during the time the case is listed here; if additional information is required, you will be asked here, and expected to respond within the 7 day period.

Case name (Sample)

Do not edit this section! Copy the text of this section into another section and edit that.
Edits to this section will be reverted immediately.

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.

Article talk pages:
User talk pages:

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

  • Issue 1
  • Issue 2

Additional issues to be mediated

  • Additional issue 1
  • Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
  • Agree.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)
Your case should look just like this when you have finished filing;
no commentary, no extra information, just what is required in this template.
If you choose to ignore these instructions, your case will likewise be ignored. Caveat lector.

New Requests

New requests immediately below this line.

Usage of the actual term "Islamophobia" by WP editors

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:


Article talk pages:
User talk pages:

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

  • Counter to the WP:NEO guidelines should the article be written while actually utilizing the "islamophobia" neologism outside of quotes and citations?

Additional issues to be mediated

  • In respect to this neologism's status should it have an Examples of use in public discourse section (similar to the Islamofascism) article as it does in this version or not, as in this version?

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
  • Agree. Netscott 17:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree on the condition that Irishpunktom end his personal attacks and name-calling against me. It doesn't make any sense, and it will not be possible to discuss any such serious matters without some basic civility, and seen in the light of the very recent and very serious NPA violations, this will have to be agreed to by Irishpunktom for me to accept and spend time on any such mediation. -- Karl Meier 17:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
We don't take conditional accepts; you have to either agree or disagree. You may propose conditions as a part of your continued participation once the mediation is accepted, but anything other than "Agree" is considered to be a refusal to take part. See the instructions on Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_mediation/Sample#Parties.27_agreement_to_mediate: Only signatures should go here, along with either "Agree" or "Do not agree." Any additional comments will be removed by a member of the Mediation Committee. Please indicate stright agreement, or disagreement. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 01:01, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)

Rules of war in Islam (in progress)

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:

Article talk pages:

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

Issues to be mediated

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

Tatu vs t.A.T.u.

File:Yes This request does not use the required format. The filing party will be contacted and asked to properly complete this request. After an appropriate time, if this request does not use the proper format, it will be declined. For assistance in filing the request, please read the guide to formal mediation or contact the Committee. To re-file this request entirely, add {{csd-u1}} to the top of the page; and, when it is deleted, go here.

Message added by 01:04, 23 May 2006 (UTC), on behalf of the Mediation Committee.

Kven users POV

Involved parties


Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.

Article talk pages:
User talk pages:

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:


Issues to be mediated

  • User Digi Wiki's refusal to accept consensus to Kven-related articles

Additional issues to be mediated

  • User Digi Wiki's general behaviour: the use of multiple sock puppets, using them to appear to be several users, abusive behaviour, abuse of talk pages.
  • The insistence on conflating two separate but related topics into one messy discussion on one of them. To wit: The historical term "kven" refers to a group of people around the Baltic Sea; these may or may not be the descendants to contemporary kvens, an ethnic minority in the north of Norway. These should be separate articles, as only one topic is actually controversial. --Leifern 23:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I assume you mean "ancestors", not "descendants". Tupsharru 09:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend: Reason for rejection (if rejected), additional required information (if extended.)
For the Mediation Committee, (Mediation Committee members only.)

Conduct of users

Click 'show' to view an index of all archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages


Harry Potter Edit War

Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Incorrect format


Click 'show' to view an index of all archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages


Anti-Americanism

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:

Article talk pages:
User talk pages:

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

  • Massive discussions on Talk that are leading nowhere.
  • Two disinterested admins contacted: . The first was reverted when he attempted to intervene on the page

Issues to be mediated

  • Two alternate and essentially incompatible intros are being reverted over.
  • Secondarily, does picture of Guantanamo Bay belong?

Additional issues to be mediated

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend:
For the Mediation Committee,


Neo-Tech

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:

Article talk pages:

  • User talk pages:

Issues to be mediated

  • This concerns the article, Neo-Tech. Bi claims that books published by Integrated Management Associates (a company that publishes material about a philosophy called Neo-Tech) cannot be used as references for the article about Neo-Tech ("Incidentally, the rules also say that "self-published books" are unacceptable as sources. Well, I think I'm going to throw out lots of stuff that come only from Neo-Tech's self-publications. Bi 10:03, 4 May 2006 (UTC)"), which is bizarre becase it's the only sources on the philosophy. Lest there be any doubt, WP:V plainly says: Self-published sources, and published sources of dubious reliability, may be used only as sources of information on themselves, and only in articles about them. For example, the Stormfront website may be used as a source of information on itself in an article about Stormfront, so long as the information is notable, not unduly self-aggrandizing, and not contradicted by reliable, third-party published sources. Self-published sources may never be used as sources of information on another person or topic. Of course you can use the books as sources about the philosophy, in the article about the philosophy! Otherwise, the article would be blank! (As an aside, I'd like to note that the company also publishes the work of other writers not associated with the company as well). Also, he sources "criticism" of Neo-Tech from web forums, self-published web pages, etc rather than from credible published sources. He expressed a desire for form dispute resolution, as have I. Please assist enforcing the Misplaced Pages policies on sourcing. It should be pretty simple and straightforward to mediate this. Thank you. RJII 01:58, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Additional issues to be mediated

  • Thank you. In addition to being self-published, the Neo-Tech literature can be considered to be "unduly self-aggrandizing", which WP:V does not allow. Besides, given that Neo-Tech literature is self-published and self-aggrandizing, it would seem unfair to use a different standard for admitting views opposed to Neo-Tech. Bi 06:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.

Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept/Reject/Extend:
For the Mediation Committee,

Archives

Click 'show' to view an index of all archives

Closed mediation cases (accepted requests)

Rejected mediation request pages

Categories: