Misplaced Pages

User talk:Yeoberry: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:39, 22 March 2013 view sourceYeoberry (talk | contribs)389 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 21:58, 22 March 2013 view source StAnselm (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers160,596 edits Warning: Edit warring on Douglas Wilson (theologian). (TW)Next edit →
Line 8: Line 8:


I'm a regular volunteer there. I reverted your listing because all listings there must be made via the button at the top of the page so that the maintenance bot that runs the page will work correctly. '''However,''' what you are requesting is a conduct dispute and DRN does not handle those. You need to go to ] for that. Regards, ] (]) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC) I'm a regular volunteer there. I reverted your listing because all listings there must be made via the button at the top of the page so that the maintenance bot that runs the page will work correctly. '''However,''' what you are requesting is a conduct dispute and DRN does not handle those. You need to go to ] for that. Regards, ] (]) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

== March 2013 ==
] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors  according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a ] on the ].

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> ]] (]) 21:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:58, 22 March 2013

Re-use the sources

Hi, I added one of the citations for Covenant Reformed Baptist Church to the page Providence, Caswell County, North Carolina. I think it is appropriate in terms of WP:DUE. Hope this helps. – Fayenatic London 13:57, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Good. Thanks.Yeoberry (talk) 22:24, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard

I'm a regular volunteer there. I reverted your listing because all listings there must be made via the button at the top of the page so that the maintenance bot that runs the page will work correctly. However, what you are requesting is a conduct dispute and DRN does not handle those. You need to go to ANI for that. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 17:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Douglas Wilson (theologian). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. StAnselm (talk) 21:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)