| Revision as of 14:12, 29 March 2013 editCirt (talk | contribs)199,086 edits commented.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:22, 29 March 2013 edit undoDemiurge1000 (talk | contribs)26,944 edits kNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| *'''Keep''': There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . <small><span style="border:1px solid red;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep''': There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . <small><span style="border:1px solid red;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep''', good deal of references in version as pointed out by {{user|Giano}}, above. — ''']''' (]) 14:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | *'''Keep''', good deal of references in version as pointed out by {{user|Giano}}, above. — ''']''' (]) 14:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained ''why'' they are unreliable. --] (]) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:22, 29 March 2013
Advice Polack
- Advice Polack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As this stands today, it's a stub with one ref of poor reliability. I tend to be more of an inclusionist when it comes to 'net memes, but at this stage this doesn't look like a keeper. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable trivia. Mcewan (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep: There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . Giano 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep, good deal of references in version as pointed out by Giano (talk · contribs), above. — Cirt (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained why they are unreliable. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)