Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Advice Polack: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:22, 29 March 2013 editDemiurge1000 (talk | contribs)26,944 edits k← Previous edit Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2013 edit undoPiotrus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Event coordinators, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers285,867 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 8: Line 8:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small> :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)</small>
**Ever heard of that little thing called BLP? --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 16:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)


*'''Keep''': There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . <small><span style="border:1px solid red;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC) *'''Keep''': There seems to be a perectly adequate and referenced vesion in the history - so I have reverted to that version. . <small><span style="border:1px solid red;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 14:00, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:59, 29 March 2013

Advice Polack

Advice Polack (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As this stands today, it's a stub with one ref of poor reliability. I tend to be more of an inclusionist when it comes to 'net memes, but at this stage this doesn't look like a keeper. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:57, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Keep. Appears to be more than adequately referenced to meet basic notability requirements. If it's to be argued that the sources used are unreliable, then it should be explained why they are unreliable. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Categories: