Revision as of 21:29, 23 May 2006 editAshenai (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers5,477 editsm wikifix← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:55, 23 May 2006 edit undoHaukurth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators26,987 edits →[]: ObservationsNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===]=== | ===]=== | ||
I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its ]. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at ], and ]. ] 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its ]. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at ], and ]. ] 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
*Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. ] 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:55, 23 May 2006
Israel News Agency
I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its deletion review. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at its first AfD nomination, and its deletion review. Ashenai 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. Haukur 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)