| Revision as of 21:55, 23 May 2006 editHaukurth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators26,987 edits →[]: Observations← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:38, 24 May 2006 edit undoSilensor (talk | contribs)2,397 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its ]. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at ], and ]. ] 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its ]. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at ], and ]. ] 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. ] 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | *Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. ] 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * How is notability being measured in this case? Are we applying ], or another standard? For the moment, I am leaning toward '''keep''' due to its frequent citation by the press, but am open to discussion. ] 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:38, 24 May 2006
Israel News Agency
I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its deletion review. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at its first AfD nomination, and its deletion review. Ashenai 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. Haukur 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- How is notability being measured in this case? Are we applying WP:WEB, or another standard? For the moment, I am leaning toward keep due to its frequent citation by the press, but am open to discussion. Silensor 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)